17.01.2015 Views

November 2007 - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

November 2007 - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

November 2007 - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

as to identify covenant and election.”*<br />

But more troublesome is T.<br />

David Gordon’s <strong>in</strong>sistence that<br />

God has a plurality of covenants—no<br />

fewer than 12 (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the covenants of redemption,<br />

works, and grace;<br />

and the various covenants of<br />

God with men <strong>in</strong> the Old Testament).<br />

He argues that the term<br />

“the covenant” (s<strong>in</strong>gular) is<br />

rarely used <strong>in</strong> the Bible, and<br />

when it is, usually the Scriptures<br />

identify the covenant to<br />

which the term refers. This<br />

prompted me quickly to search<br />

the KJV, <strong>in</strong> which I found 102<br />

<strong>in</strong>stances of “the covenant”<br />

(s<strong>in</strong>gular), 51 of “my covenant”<br />

(s<strong>in</strong>gular), 18 of “his covenant”<br />

(s<strong>in</strong>gular), and only three times<br />

where the word “covenant” is<br />

found <strong>in</strong> the plural. So I f<strong>in</strong>d it<br />

hard to swallow the argument<br />

that Murray’s view that God has<br />

one covenant with His people<br />

has generated the heretical<br />

views of Shepherd, Bahnsen,<br />

and Auburn theology.<br />

White and Beisner’s chapter<br />

is troublesome because it<br />

argues that conditions played a<br />

role <strong>in</strong> the covenant adm<strong>in</strong>istrations<br />

of God <strong>in</strong> the Old Testament.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to them, Adam<br />

<strong>in</strong> the state of perfection could<br />

merit eternal life by his obedi-<br />

Book Reviews<br />

ence. The seeds of Noah,<br />

Abraham, and David enjoyed<br />

temporal, earthly bless<strong>in</strong>gs (accompanied<br />

by temporal curses)<br />

on the basis of the obedience of<br />

these men. These bless<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

were temporal and earthly only,<br />

and not everlast<strong>in</strong>g and spiritual,<br />

because the obedience of<br />

these men was not perfect. The<br />

authors speak of the Mosaic<br />

covenant as “bilateral, conditional”<br />

(p. 160). White and<br />

Beisner are clear that the covenant<br />

of God with His people <strong>in</strong><br />

the new dispensation is not conditioned<br />

on any works that we<br />

do, but is founded on the person<br />

and work of Christ. But the<br />

thoughts expressed <strong>in</strong> the chapter<br />

underm<strong>in</strong>e the idea that<br />

God’s covenant with His people<br />

throughout history is one covenant;<br />

that it was always based<br />

on Christ; that all the bless<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

of that covenant were bless<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

bestowed by grace, not earned<br />

by works. Scriptures such as<br />

Romans 4:13-16 and others contradict<br />

the ideas set forth <strong>in</strong> this<br />

* David J. Engelsma, The Covenant<br />

of God and the Children of<br />

Believers: Sovereign Grace <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Covenant (Jenison, MI: <strong>Reformed</strong><br />

Free Publish<strong>in</strong>g Association,<br />

2005), p. 176.<br />

<strong>November</strong> <strong>2007</strong> 109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!