17.01.2015 Views

November 2007 - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

November 2007 - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

November 2007 - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Book Reviews<br />

<strong>in</strong> Systematic Theology”; Kev<strong>in</strong><br />

J. Vanhoozer, “On the Very Idea<br />

of a Theological System: An<br />

Essay <strong>in</strong> Aid of Triangulat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Scripture, Church and World”;<br />

A. T. B. McGowan, “The Atonement<br />

as Penal Substitution”;<br />

Richard C. Gamble, “The Relationship<br />

between Biblical Theology<br />

and Systematic Theology”;<br />

Henri Blocher, “Old Covenant,<br />

New Covenant”; Richard<br />

B. Gaff<strong>in</strong>, Jr., “Union with<br />

Christ: Some Biblical and Theological<br />

Reflections”; Cornelis P.<br />

Venema, “Justification: The<br />

Ecumenical, Biblical and Theological<br />

Dimensions of Current<br />

Debates”; and Derek W. H. Thomas,<br />

“The Doctr<strong>in</strong>e of the<br />

Church <strong>in</strong> the Twenty-First Century.”<br />

The more profitable contributions<br />

to Always Reform<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong><br />

the judgment of this reviewer,<br />

are the pieces by Reymond,<br />

McGowan, Gamble, Venema,<br />

and Thomas. Reymond surveys<br />

the extensive New Testament<br />

evidence for Jesus’ deity, demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

conclusively, from<br />

Gowan’s contribution on “The<br />

Atonement As Penal Substitution”<br />

is well done. Over aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

all other theories of the atonement,<br />

he demonstrates that the<br />

classic <strong>Reformed</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>e of the<br />

atonement as penal substitution<br />

is the clear teach<strong>in</strong>g of Scripture<br />

and the only answer to the<br />

real need of guilty s<strong>in</strong>ners.<br />

Gamble discusses the relationship<br />

between biblical theology<br />

and systematic theology. He<br />

defends the position that biblical<br />

theology is the handmaid of<br />

systematic theology. Although<br />

there are issues regard<strong>in</strong>g biblical<br />

theology and the basic approach<br />

of biblical theology,<br />

Gamble’s <strong>in</strong>sistence on the importance<br />

of careful, honest exegesis<br />

as the foundation for all<br />

theology and his commitment to<br />

the full <strong>in</strong>errancy and authority<br />

of Scripture are appreciated.<br />

Venema’s treatment of justification<br />

by faith alone and his <strong>in</strong>sistence<br />

on the forensic nature<br />

of justification are to be commended.<br />

He also provides a<br />

good evaluation of Lutherans<br />

several exegetical po<strong>in</strong>ts of and Catholics together,<br />

view, the united witness to the<br />

godhead of Jesus. He concludes<br />

his chapter by consider<strong>in</strong>g some<br />

of the weighty issues that <strong>Reformed</strong><br />

theologians face <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Evangelicals and Catholics together,<br />

and the New Perspective<br />

on Paul. Thomas’ treatment of<br />

the doctr<strong>in</strong>e of the church is to<br />

be commended. Much appreciated<br />

area of Christology. Mc<br />

is his <strong>in</strong>sistence on the im-<br />

<strong>November</strong> <strong>2007</strong> 113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!