17.01.2015 Views

November 2007 - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

November 2007 - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

November 2007 - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Protestant</strong> <strong>Reformed</strong> Theological Journal<br />

reprobate are the recipients of such common works of the Spirit,<br />

which do not necessarily issue <strong>in</strong> salvation, the implication is that<br />

man has a role to play. He must be careful not to suppress such<br />

works <strong>in</strong> him. An unregenerate man has a fully function<strong>in</strong>g will,<br />

but his will has been corrupted. Therefore Perk<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>sisted that<br />

regeneration affects the goodness of man’s will, not the faculty of<br />

will<strong>in</strong>g itself:<br />

Regeneration does not change the operations of the human faculties<br />

themselves, but only ‘the goodness thereof,’ because the former rema<strong>in</strong>s<br />

unaltered while the latter was lost <strong>in</strong> the Fall. Insofar as the<br />

human faculties are concerned, therefore, one may speak of preparation<br />

for conversion … <strong>in</strong>sofar as the goodness of the will is concerned,<br />

however … the s<strong>in</strong>ner may never prepare himself for conversion<br />

as the will itself is <strong>in</strong> need of be<strong>in</strong>g ‘born aga<strong>in</strong>.’ 5<br />

Aga<strong>in</strong> to the question, ‘whether the natural corrupted will can <strong>in</strong> any<br />

way prepare and dispose itself to his own conversion and justification,’<br />

Perk<strong>in</strong>s replies: ‘…But the certa<strong>in</strong> truth is, that the will cannot.’<br />

6<br />

Perk<strong>in</strong>s dist<strong>in</strong>guished between different preparatory works. He<br />

did this by subdivid<strong>in</strong>g such operations <strong>in</strong>to the “beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs of<br />

preparation” and the “beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs of compunction.” The former<br />

he called “the m<strong>in</strong>istry of the law.” These beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs of preparation,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to Perk<strong>in</strong>s, are not gracious. They are common<br />

operations of the Spirit, which give no <strong>in</strong>dication of whether God<br />

<strong>in</strong>tends to save the s<strong>in</strong>ner or not. Pangs of conscience, fear of<br />

punishment, horror over one’s s<strong>in</strong>s, and deep conviction could be<br />

merely foretastes of hell, not evidence of the grace of God work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the heart. On the other hand, the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs of compunction<br />

are gracious and lead to true conversion. The reprobate<br />

partake of the former, but only the elect of the latter works. This<br />

dichotomy “served not only to safeguard div<strong>in</strong>e monergism <strong>in</strong> sal-<br />

5. Song, Theology, p. 133.<br />

6. Song, Theology, p. 134.<br />

60<br />

Vol. 41, No. 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!