Vol 43 # 2 June 2011 - Kma.org.kw
Vol 43 # 2 June 2011 - Kma.org.kw
Vol 43 # 2 June 2011 - Kma.org.kw
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
94<br />
The Knowledge of Teratogenicity in the Prevention of Congenital Anomalies<br />
<strong>June</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />
were most severely affected by cyclophosphamide as<br />
in the case of the forelimb on day 13 of gestation. In<br />
contrast, the hind limb that rapidly proliferates was<br />
less severely affected. These authors suggested that<br />
cyclophosphamide exerts teratogenic effect on its<br />
target by disturbing the RNA metabolism, which varies<br />
according to the state of differentiation of the cell [61-63] .<br />
Pharmaco-kinetics and metabolic factors in general<br />
do not appear to play an important role in target <strong>org</strong>an<br />
specificity of teratogens. During the <strong>org</strong>anogenesis<br />
period in rodents the embryo has little capacity to<br />
activate drugs via mixed function oxidase metabolism.<br />
The amount of cytotoxic agents reaching the cell,<br />
differential drug distribution, permeability of cells to<br />
the agent and amount of intra-cellar binding do not<br />
appear to be important factors in determining which<br />
embryonic <strong>org</strong>an systems are damaged, but rather<br />
intrinsic cell differences related to rate of proliferation<br />
and differentiative state appear to determine which<br />
cells are susceptible to teratogenesis [61] .<br />
So far as the depression in DNA synthesis and<br />
cell death is concerned in embryonic as well as adult<br />
tissues treated with teratogenic agents, cytotoxicity<br />
can be assumed to be a common biological property of<br />
these agents. Whether or not birth defects results from<br />
the cytotoxic response of the embryos, teratogenesis<br />
depends upon gestational time of treatment<br />
(proliferative and differentiative state of the target<br />
<strong>org</strong>an), and the extent of cell death [62] .<br />
MUTATION IN TERATOGENESIS<br />
Mutagen is an agent - toxin, radiation, virus - capable<br />
of causing mutation, that is, a relatively permanent<br />
change in DNA, the hereditary material. The amount<br />
of damage caused by a mutagen depends on three<br />
factors: (1) chemical reactivity between DNA and the<br />
mutagen, (2) the concentration or dose of the mutagen,<br />
and (3) length of exposure time of DNA to mutagen.<br />
Damage and repair to DNA are constantly occurring;<br />
but when the damage is not repaired the result can<br />
be cancer or cell death. Also, genetic diseases such as<br />
cystic fibrosis and sickle cell disease can be caused by a<br />
single DNA mutation in one gene [65] .<br />
Mutation is a permanent alteration in DNA<br />
produced by base-pair substitutions, frame-shift<br />
mutations, aneuploidy / polyploidy (gain or loss of<br />
chromosomes), or chromosome aberrations (deletion,<br />
translocation, duplication). If mutations occur in germ<br />
cells, they can lead to teratogenic effects. For example,<br />
acrylamide found in some pre-cooked and processed<br />
foods can cause reduced fertility in males [38] . The role<br />
played by mutation as a fundamental mechanism in<br />
teratogenesis has been receiving little experimental<br />
attention, even though somatic mutation is postulated<br />
to be one of the underlying causes of birth defects.<br />
Mutagenic lesions are believed to be distinguishable<br />
from teratogenic responses in that the former are<br />
transmissible to future generations, whereas the<br />
latter are confined to a single generation. The lack of<br />
experimental examination of mutagenesis could be<br />
due to the prominence of teratogenic damage. Dead<br />
cells cannot transmit genetic defects to progeny cells.<br />
The belief that teratogenesis occurs when more cells are<br />
removed from a population of cells destined to form<br />
an <strong>org</strong>an rudiment that can be replaced by restorative<br />
hyperplasia within the critical period needs to be reexamined.<br />
Cell death invariably accompanies chemical<br />
induced heritable mutation and transformations, but it<br />
is not believed to be causative factor in these genetic<br />
alterations. It seems logical that DNA damaging lesions<br />
could be the initial event to cell death [66-70] .<br />
REPARATIVE GROWTH FOLLOWING<br />
TERATOGENESIS<br />
The importance of reparative processes in the final<br />
expression of malformation after teratogenic insults<br />
has not been given adequate consideration in the field<br />
of teratology. For most teratogenic agents, a threshold<br />
dose exists below which abnormal development cannot<br />
be detected [<strong>43</strong>] . This ‘threshold’ changes throughout<br />
gestation and there are developmental stages, that is,<br />
during <strong>org</strong>anogenesis period, during which embryo<br />
is highly resistant to teratogenic insults. Implicit in<br />
this concept of a threshold dose is that the embryo<br />
possesses a varying capacity at different developmental<br />
stages to repair teratogenic damage [<strong>43</strong>] . Repairs of<br />
teratogenic insults during the <strong>org</strong>anogenesis period<br />
which hitherto had traditionally been viewed in terms<br />
of tissue regeneration or of restorative hyperplasia of<br />
the surviving cells to replace dead cells undergoing<br />
necrosis from teratogenic insults would be interesting<br />
to investigate. Study of the differential capacity of cells<br />
surviving teratogenic insults versus those that die may<br />
contribute to an understanding to the process of cell<br />
death. Correlation of the time dependent insults with<br />
the rate of repair of DNA damage may help elucidate<br />
the target <strong>org</strong>an specificity of certain teratogens. For<br />
example, the question may be asked: are embryonic<br />
limbs susceptible to teratogenic insults on day 11 of<br />
gestation but not on day 14 due to a depressed capacity<br />
of the day 11 bud to repair DNA damage Such<br />
questions yet need to be addressed as earlier workers<br />
in this field had pointed out [<strong>43</strong>] .<br />
The processes whereby embryos cope with<br />
teratogenic assaults are fundamental to understanding<br />
the mechanisms of teratology. A deleterious response<br />
may occur only after the defense mechanisms are<br />
overwhelmed. Embryonic repairs had traditionally<br />
been regarded in term of tissues regeneration. The<br />
critical lesions, however, involve injury to individual<br />
cells. Detailed analyses of the capacity of the embryonic<br />
cells to repair lesions in DNA during the <strong>org</strong>anogenesis