17.01.2015 Views

Vol 43 # 2 June 2011 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 43 # 2 June 2011 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 43 # 2 June 2011 - Kma.org.kw

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

94<br />

The Knowledge of Teratogenicity in the Prevention of Congenital Anomalies<br />

<strong>June</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

were most severely affected by cyclophosphamide as<br />

in the case of the forelimb on day 13 of gestation. In<br />

contrast, the hind limb that rapidly proliferates was<br />

less severely affected. These authors suggested that<br />

cyclophosphamide exerts teratogenic effect on its<br />

target by disturbing the RNA metabolism, which varies<br />

according to the state of differentiation of the cell [61-63] .<br />

Pharmaco-kinetics and metabolic factors in general<br />

do not appear to play an important role in target <strong>org</strong>an<br />

specificity of teratogens. During the <strong>org</strong>anogenesis<br />

period in rodents the embryo has little capacity to<br />

activate drugs via mixed function oxidase metabolism.<br />

The amount of cytotoxic agents reaching the cell,<br />

differential drug distribution, permeability of cells to<br />

the agent and amount of intra-cellar binding do not<br />

appear to be important factors in determining which<br />

embryonic <strong>org</strong>an systems are damaged, but rather<br />

intrinsic cell differences related to rate of proliferation<br />

and differentiative state appear to determine which<br />

cells are susceptible to teratogenesis [61] .<br />

So far as the depression in DNA synthesis and<br />

cell death is concerned in embryonic as well as adult<br />

tissues treated with teratogenic agents, cytotoxicity<br />

can be assumed to be a common biological property of<br />

these agents. Whether or not birth defects results from<br />

the cytotoxic response of the embryos, teratogenesis<br />

depends upon gestational time of treatment<br />

(proliferative and differentiative state of the target<br />

<strong>org</strong>an), and the extent of cell death [62] .<br />

MUTATION IN TERATOGENESIS<br />

Mutagen is an agent - toxin, radiation, virus - capable<br />

of causing mutation, that is, a relatively permanent<br />

change in DNA, the hereditary material. The amount<br />

of damage caused by a mutagen depends on three<br />

factors: (1) chemical reactivity between DNA and the<br />

mutagen, (2) the concentration or dose of the mutagen,<br />

and (3) length of exposure time of DNA to mutagen.<br />

Damage and repair to DNA are constantly occurring;<br />

but when the damage is not repaired the result can<br />

be cancer or cell death. Also, genetic diseases such as<br />

cystic fibrosis and sickle cell disease can be caused by a<br />

single DNA mutation in one gene [65] .<br />

Mutation is a permanent alteration in DNA<br />

produced by base-pair substitutions, frame-shift<br />

mutations, aneuploidy / polyploidy (gain or loss of<br />

chromosomes), or chromosome aberrations (deletion,<br />

translocation, duplication). If mutations occur in germ<br />

cells, they can lead to teratogenic effects. For example,<br />

acrylamide found in some pre-cooked and processed<br />

foods can cause reduced fertility in males [38] . The role<br />

played by mutation as a fundamental mechanism in<br />

teratogenesis has been receiving little experimental<br />

attention, even though somatic mutation is postulated<br />

to be one of the underlying causes of birth defects.<br />

Mutagenic lesions are believed to be distinguishable<br />

from teratogenic responses in that the former are<br />

transmissible to future generations, whereas the<br />

latter are confined to a single generation. The lack of<br />

experimental examination of mutagenesis could be<br />

due to the prominence of teratogenic damage. Dead<br />

cells cannot transmit genetic defects to progeny cells.<br />

The belief that teratogenesis occurs when more cells are<br />

removed from a population of cells destined to form<br />

an <strong>org</strong>an rudiment that can be replaced by restorative<br />

hyperplasia within the critical period needs to be reexamined.<br />

Cell death invariably accompanies chemical<br />

induced heritable mutation and transformations, but it<br />

is not believed to be causative factor in these genetic<br />

alterations. It seems logical that DNA damaging lesions<br />

could be the initial event to cell death [66-70] .<br />

REPARATIVE GROWTH FOLLOWING<br />

TERATOGENESIS<br />

The importance of reparative processes in the final<br />

expression of malformation after teratogenic insults<br />

has not been given adequate consideration in the field<br />

of teratology. For most teratogenic agents, a threshold<br />

dose exists below which abnormal development cannot<br />

be detected [<strong>43</strong>] . This ‘threshold’ changes throughout<br />

gestation and there are developmental stages, that is,<br />

during <strong>org</strong>anogenesis period, during which embryo<br />

is highly resistant to teratogenic insults. Implicit in<br />

this concept of a threshold dose is that the embryo<br />

possesses a varying capacity at different developmental<br />

stages to repair teratogenic damage [<strong>43</strong>] . Repairs of<br />

teratogenic insults during the <strong>org</strong>anogenesis period<br />

which hitherto had traditionally been viewed in terms<br />

of tissue regeneration or of restorative hyperplasia of<br />

the surviving cells to replace dead cells undergoing<br />

necrosis from teratogenic insults would be interesting<br />

to investigate. Study of the differential capacity of cells<br />

surviving teratogenic insults versus those that die may<br />

contribute to an understanding to the process of cell<br />

death. Correlation of the time dependent insults with<br />

the rate of repair of DNA damage may help elucidate<br />

the target <strong>org</strong>an specificity of certain teratogens. For<br />

example, the question may be asked: are embryonic<br />

limbs susceptible to teratogenic insults on day 11 of<br />

gestation but not on day 14 due to a depressed capacity<br />

of the day 11 bud to repair DNA damage Such<br />

questions yet need to be addressed as earlier workers<br />

in this field had pointed out [<strong>43</strong>] .<br />

The processes whereby embryos cope with<br />

teratogenic assaults are fundamental to understanding<br />

the mechanisms of teratology. A deleterious response<br />

may occur only after the defense mechanisms are<br />

overwhelmed. Embryonic repairs had traditionally<br />

been regarded in term of tissues regeneration. The<br />

critical lesions, however, involve injury to individual<br />

cells. Detailed analyses of the capacity of the embryonic<br />

cells to repair lesions in DNA during the <strong>org</strong>anogenesis

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!