17.01.2015 Views

Vol 43 # 2 June 2011 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 43 # 2 June 2011 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 43 # 2 June 2011 - Kma.org.kw

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>June</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL 105<br />

Original Article<br />

Inducible Clindamycin Resistance in Staphylococcus Aureus:<br />

A Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital of North India<br />

Neha Bansal 1 , Uma Chaudhary 2 , Vivek Gupta 3<br />

1<br />

Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India<br />

2<br />

Department of Microbiology, Pt. BDS University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India<br />

3<br />

Department of General Medicine, National Institute of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India<br />

Kuwait Medical Journal <strong>2011</strong>; <strong>43</strong> (2): 105-108<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Objectives: Clindamycin is a preferred therapeutic option<br />

in erythromycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft<br />

tissue infections. However, a major concern regarding its<br />

use for staphylococcal infections is the possible presence<br />

of inducible resistance to clindamycin. The present study<br />

was aimed to determine the incidence of constitutive and<br />

inducible clindamycin resistance in S.aureus isolates in our<br />

hospital.<br />

Design: Retrospective study<br />

Setting: Pt. BDS University of Health Sciences, Rohtak,<br />

Haryana, India<br />

Subjects: A total of 250 consecutive, non-duplicate S.aureus<br />

strains were isolated from various clinical specimens, both<br />

from inpatients and outpatients.<br />

Intervensions: Antibiotic susceptibility tests were<br />

performed using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method.<br />

Methicillin resistance was detected by oxacillin disc on<br />

Mueller-Hinton Agar (MHA) plate supplemented with 2%<br />

NaCl. D-test was performed on all erythromycin-resistant<br />

and clindamycin-sensitive isolates to detect inducible<br />

clindamycin resistance.<br />

Main Outcome Measures: Observed and counted were<br />

methicillin resistance in S.aureus, constitutive and inducible<br />

resistance of the isolates to clindamycin, origin of the MLSBi<br />

isolates that is “community” or “hospital” and resistance of<br />

MLSBi isolates to other drugs.<br />

Results: Among 250 S.aureus strains, 112 (44.8%) were found<br />

to be Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and<br />

20% had MLSBi phenotype. MRSA isolates showed higher<br />

inducible as well as constitutive resistance (p < 0.0001) to<br />

clindamycin as compared to methicillin-sensitive S.aureus<br />

(MSSA). All S.aureus isolates having MLSBi phenotype<br />

were sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid.<br />

Conclusions: The study strongly recommends the routine<br />

testing of in vitro inducible clindamycin resistance in<br />

S.aureus isolates as it will help in guiding therapy.<br />

KEY WORDS: erythromycin, D-test, lincosamide, MLSBi phenotype<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The increasing incidence of methicillin-resistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and changing<br />

patterns in antimicrobial resistance have led to<br />

renewed interest in the use of macrolide-lincosamidegroup<br />

B streptogramin (MLSB) antibiotics to treat<br />

such infections [1] . The MLSB antibiotics are chemically<br />

distinct but exert similar action by binding to 50S<br />

ribosomal subunit inhibiting bacterial protein<br />

synthesis [2] . Macrolide resistance in staphylococci<br />

may be due to an active efflux mechanism encoded<br />

by msrA gene (conferring resistance to macrolides<br />

and group B streptogramins only) or may be due<br />

to ribosomal target modification, mediated via erm<br />

gene, which encodes enzymes that confer inducible<br />

or constitutive resistance to MLSB agents (MLSB<br />

resistance). In constitutive MLSB resistance, rRNA<br />

methylase is always produced, compared to inducible<br />

MLSB resistance where methylase is produced only in<br />

the presence of an effective inducer [3,4] . In vitro, S. aureus<br />

isolates with constitutive resistance (MLSBc strains)<br />

are resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin, while,<br />

isolates with inducible resistance (MLSBi strains) are<br />

resistant to erythromycin but appear susceptible to<br />

clindamycin. Failure to identify MLSBi resistance may<br />

lead to clinical failure of clindamycin therapy due to<br />

selection of constitutive erm mutants [5] . This inducible<br />

MLSB resistance is not recognized by using standard<br />

susceptibility test methods, including standard broth<br />

- based or agar dilution susceptibility tests. However,<br />

it can be detected by a simple disc approximation<br />

test (D-test) by placing erythromycin (inducer) and<br />

clindamycin discs in adjacent positions. Flattening or<br />

blunting of the zone around clindamycin disc adjacent<br />

to erythromycin disc indicates the presence of inducible<br />

resistance to clindamycin [3] .<br />

Address correspondence to:<br />

Dr. Neha Bansal, MBBS, MD, Demonstrator, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector-32 D, Chandigarh,<br />

India. Tel: +919216588849, +91172-5097461, E-mail: drneha_bansal@yahoo.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!