17.01.2015 Views

Vol 43 # 2 June 2011 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 43 # 2 June 2011 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 43 # 2 June 2011 - Kma.org.kw

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

100<br />

Quantitative Postural Sway Assessment by Computerized Dynamic Posturography ...<br />

<strong>June</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

sports and balance clinics, were recruited for this<br />

study. Information from medical chart reviews was<br />

linked with survey data to create the database for the<br />

analyses. The diagnosis of chronic ankle sprain was<br />

made through a careful examination. X-rays of the<br />

ankle were done to rule out any bony pathology.<br />

All the patients and the control group<br />

healthy individuals were evaluated clinically by<br />

musculoskeletal and neurological examination.<br />

Inclusion criterion for the trial included the ability<br />

to ambulate 25 feet independently. Exclusion criteria<br />

were the following: cognitive deficit; peripheral<br />

neuropathy; significant visual field defects; cerebellar<br />

or brain stem lesions; serious cardiac conditions; severe<br />

weight-bearing pain; and other serious <strong>org</strong>an and<br />

system disorders. After subjects passed the screening<br />

criteria, an informed consent was taken.<br />

Computerized dynamic posturography [8]<br />

All the subjects were evaluated clinically and<br />

tested by computerized dynamic posturography for<br />

the unilateral stance test. The unilateral stance test<br />

quantifies postural sway velocity with the patient<br />

standing independently on either the right or left foot<br />

on the force platform, with eyes open and with eyes<br />

closed. The length of each trial was ten seconds.<br />

Mean centre of gravity (COG) sway velocity<br />

(degree/second) which displays COG stability was<br />

taken while the patient stood independently on each<br />

leg with eyes open and with eyes closed. In Fig. 1 and 2,<br />

the center bar graph displays the percentage difference<br />

score of COG sway velocity with the bar pointing in the<br />

direction of the limb with the better performance. The<br />

shaded area on each graphic represents performance<br />

outside of the normative data range. Green bars<br />

indicate performance within the normal range; red<br />

bars indicate performance outside the normal range. A<br />

numerical value is given at the top of each bar.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

Study data were analyzed using the SPSS (version<br />

11.0) statistical package. The Student’s “t” test<br />

indicates the magnitude of the difference of means<br />

and therefore, the magnitude of the observation. A<br />

Fig. 1: Represents normal unilateral stance test of dynamic posturography

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!