Download - Future of the Internet – And how to stop it.

168
Solutions
scribed earlier, the ambition is for third parties to contribute their own dashboard
gauges—allowing users of Herdict to draw from a market of advisers,
each of whom can draw from some combination of the herd’s data and their
own expertise to give users advice. The idea is that by reformulating our vision
of the network to extend beyond mere “endpoints” and “middles,” we can keep
our eyes on the real value at stake: individual freedom to experiment with new
code and anything made possible by it, the touchstone of a generative system.
EXTRA-LEGAL INCENTIVES TO SOLVE THE GENERATIVE PROBLEM:
FROM WIKIPEDIA TO MAPS AND STOPBADWARE
Some of the suggested solutions here include legal intervention, such as liability
for technology producers in certain circumstances. Legal interventions face
certain hurdles in the Internet space. One sovereign cannot reach every potentially
responsible entity on a global network, and while commercial forces can
respond well to legal incentives, 30 the amateur technology producers that are so
important to a generative system are less likely to shape their behavior to conform
to subtle legal standards.
The ongoing success of enterprises like Wikipedia suggests that social problems
can be met first with social solutions—aided by powerful technical
tools—rather than by resorting to law. As we have seen, vandalism, copyright
infringement, and lies on Wikipedia are typically solved not by declaring that
vandals are breaking laws against “exceeding authorized access” to Wikipedia or
by suits for infringement or defamation, but rather through a community
process that, astoundingly, has impact.
In the absence of consistent interventions by law, we also have seen some
peer-produced-and-implemented responses to perceived security problems at
the Internet’s technical layer, and they demonstrate both the value and drawbacks
of a grassroots system designed to facilitate choice by endpoints about
with whom to communicate or what software to run.
One example is the early implementation of the Mail Abuse Prevention System
(MAPS) as a way of dealing with spam. In the summer of 1997, Internet
pioneer Paul Vixie decided he had had enough of spam. He started keeping a
list of those IP addresses that he believed were involved in originating spam,
discovered through either his own sleuthing or that of others whom he trusted.
The first thing he did with the list was make sure the entities on it could not
send him e-mail. Next he made his list instantly available over the network so