18.01.2015 Views

Quantum Field Theory I

Quantum Field Theory I

Quantum Field Theory I

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110 CHAPTER 3. INTERACTING QUANTUM FIELDS<br />

the LSZ reduction formula<br />

The Lehman–Symanczik–Zimmerman reduction formula relates the S-matrix<br />

elements to the Green functions. It is derived by means of a notoriously known<br />

trick — inserting the unit operator in a proper form at a proper place.<br />

Let us consider the n-point Green function G(x 1 ,...,x n ) with ⃗x i being far<br />

apart from each other. In this region the Hamiltonian can be replaced by the<br />

effective one, i.e. by H0 eff . The basis of the effective Hamiltonian eigenstates<br />

can be taken in the standard form 44<br />

|Ω〉 |⃗p〉 =<br />

√<br />

2E eff<br />

⃗p a+eff ⃗p<br />

|Ω〉 |⃗p,⃗p ′ 〉 =<br />

√<br />

2E eff<br />

⃗p a+eff ⃗p<br />

|⃗p ′ 〉 ...<br />

Our starting point will be an insertion of the unit operator in the form<br />

∫ d 3 ∫<br />

p 1 1 d 3 p 1 d 3 p 2 1<br />

1 = |Ω〉〈Ω|+<br />

(2π) 3 2E⃗p eff |⃗p 1 〉〈⃗p 1 |+<br />

1<br />

(2π) 6 2E⃗p eff<br />

1<br />

2E⃗p eff |⃗p 1 ,⃗p 2 〉〈⃗p 2 ,⃗p 1 |+...<br />

2<br />

between the first two fields. For sake of notational convenience (and without a<br />

loss of generality) we will assume x 0 1 ≤ x0 2 ≤ ... ≤ x0 n and write<br />

G(x 1 ,...,x n ) = 〈Ω|ϕ H (x 1 )|Ω〉〈Ω|ϕ H (x 2 )...ϕ H (x n )|Ω〉<br />

∫ d 3 p 1 1<br />

+<br />

(2π) 3 2E⃗p eff 〈Ω|ϕ H (x 1 )|⃗p 1 〉〈⃗p 1 |ϕ H (x 2 )...ϕ H (x n )|Ω〉+...<br />

1<br />

The main trick which makes this insertion useful, is to express the x-dependence<br />

of the fields via the space-time translations generators P µ<br />

ϕ H (x) = e iPx ϕ H (0)e −iPx<br />

and then to utilize that |Ω〉, |⃗p〉, |⃗p,⃗p ′ 〉, ... are eigenstates of P µ , i.e. that<br />

e −iPx |Ω〉 = |Ω〉 (where we have set E Ω = 0), e −iPx |⃗p〉 = e −ipx |⃗p〉 (where<br />

p 0 = E⃗p eff),<br />

e−iPx |⃗p,⃗p ′ 〉 = e −i(p+p′ )x |⃗p,⃗p ′ 〉, etc. In this way one obtains<br />

∫ d 3 p 1 e −ip1x1<br />

G(x 1 ,...,x n ) =<br />

(2π) 3 2E⃗p eff 〈Ω|ϕ H (0)|⃗p 1 〉〈⃗p 1 |ϕ H (x 2 )...ϕ H (x n )|Ω〉+...<br />

1<br />

wheretheellipsescontainthevacuumandthemultiparticle-statescontributions.<br />

At the first sight the matrix element 〈Ω|ϕ H (0)|⃗p〉 depends on ⃗p, but in<br />

fact it is a constatnt independent of ⃗p. To see this one just need to insert<br />

another unit operator, now written as U −1<br />

⃗p U ⃗p, where U ⃗p is the representation of<br />

the Lorentz boost which transfors the 3-momentum ⃗p to ⃗0. Making use of the<br />

Lorentz invariance of both the nonperturbative vacuum 〈Ω|U −1<br />

⃗p<br />

= 〈Ω| and the<br />

scalar field U ⃗p ϕ H (0)U −1<br />

⃗p<br />

= ϕ H (0), one can get rid of the explicit ⃗p-dependence<br />

in the matrix element 45<br />

〈Ω|ϕ H (0)|⃗p〉 = 〈Ω|U −1<br />

⃗p U ⃗pϕ H (0)U −1<br />

⃗p U ⃗p|⃗p〉 = 〈Ω|ϕ H (0)|⃗0〉<br />

44 Note that we are implicitly assuming only one type of particles here, otherwise we should<br />

make a difference between 1-particle states with the same momentum, but different masses<br />

(i.e.to write e.g.|m,⃗p〉 and |m ′ ,⃗p〉). It is, however, easy to reinstall other 1-particle states, if<br />

there are any.<br />

45 For higher spins one should take into account nontrivial transformation properties of<br />

the field components. But the main achievement, which is that one gets rid of the explicit<br />

3-momentum dependence, remains unchanged.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!