18.01.2015 Views

Quantum Field Theory I

Quantum Field Theory I

Quantum Field Theory I

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62 CHAPTER 2. FREE SCALAR QUANTUM FIELD<br />

Side remark on complex fields<br />

For the introductory exposition of the basic ideas and techniques of QFT, the<br />

real scalar field is an appropriate and sufficient tool. At this point, however, it<br />

seems natural to say a few words also about complex scalar fields. If nothing<br />

else, the similarities and differences between the real and the complex scalar<br />

fields are quite illustrative. The content of this paragraph is not needed for<br />

the understanding of what follows, it is presented here rather for sake of future<br />

references.<br />

The Lagrangian density for the free complex scalar fields reads<br />

L[ϕ ∗ ,ϕ] = ∂ µ ϕ ∗ ∂ µ ϕ−m 2 ϕ ∗ ϕ<br />

where ϕ = ϕ 1 + iϕ 2 . The complex field ϕ is a (complex) linear combination<br />

of two real fields ϕ 1 and ϕ 2 . One can treat either ϕ 1 and ϕ 2 , or ϕ and ϕ ∗ as<br />

independent variables, the particular choice is just the mater of taste. Usually<br />

the pair ϕ and ϕ ∗ is much more convenient.<br />

It is straightforward to check that the Lagrange-Euler equation for ϕ and<br />

ϕ ∗ (as well as for ϕ 1 and ϕ 2 ) is the Klein-Gordon equation. Performing now<br />

the 3D Fourier transformation of both ϕ(⃗x,t) and ϕ ∗ (⃗x,t), one immediately<br />

realizes (just like in the case of the real scalar field) that ϕ(⃗p,t) and ϕ ∗ (⃗p,t)<br />

play the role of the coordinate of a harmonic oscillator<br />

¨ϕ(⃗p,t)+(⃗p 2 +m 2 )ϕ(⃗p,t) = 0<br />

¨ϕ ∗ (⃗p,t)+(⃗p 2 +m 2 )ϕ ∗ (⃗p,t) = 0<br />

while π(⃗p,t) = ˙ϕ ∗ (⃗p,t) and π ∗ (⃗p,t) = ˙ϕ(⃗p,t) play the role of the corresponding<br />

momenta. The variable ⃗p plays the role of the index and the frequency of the<br />

oscillator with the index ⃗p is ω 2 ⃗p = ⃗p2 +m 2<br />

Quantization of each mode proceeds again just like in the case of the real<br />

field. For the ϕ field one obtains 17<br />

ω⃗p<br />

a ⃗p (t) = ϕ(⃗p,t)√<br />

2 +π∗ i<br />

(⃗p,t) √<br />

2ω⃗p<br />

√<br />

A + ⃗p (t) = ϕ(⃗p,t) ω⃗p<br />

2 −π∗ i<br />

(⃗p,t) √<br />

2ω⃗p<br />

but now, on the contrary to the real field case, there is no relation between A + ⃗p<br />

and a + ⃗p . It is a common habit to replace the symbol A+ ⃗p by the symbol b+ −⃗p = A+ ⃗p<br />

and to write the fields as 18<br />

∫<br />

ϕ(⃗x,t) =<br />

∫<br />

ϕ ∗ (⃗x,t) =<br />

d 3 p<br />

(2π) 3 1<br />

√<br />

2ω⃗p<br />

(<br />

a ⃗p (t)e i⃗p.⃗x +b + ⃗p (t)e−i⃗p.⃗x)<br />

d 3 p 1<br />

(<br />

(2π) 3 √ a + ⃗p (t)e−i⃗p.⃗x +b ⃗p (t)e i⃗p.⃗x)<br />

2ω⃗p<br />

17 For the ϕ ∗ field one has the complex conjugated relations<br />

a + ⃗p (t) = ϕ∗ (⃗p,t) √ ω ⃗p /2+iπ(⃗p,t)/ √ 2ω ⃗p and A ⃗p (t) = ϕ ∗ (⃗p,t) √ ω ⃗p /2−iπ(⃗p,t)/ √ 2ω ⃗p<br />

18 For the momenta one has<br />

π(⃗x,t) = ∫ √<br />

d 3 p ω⃗p<br />

)<br />

(2π) 3 (−i)<br />

(a 2 ⃗p (t)e i⃗p.⃗x −b + ⃗p (t)e−i⃗p.⃗x<br />

π ∗ (⃗x,t) = ∫ √<br />

d 3 p ω⃗p<br />

)<br />

(2π) 3 i<br />

(a + 2 ⃗p (t)e−i⃗p.⃗x −b ⃗p (t)e i⃗p.⃗x

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!