18.01.2015 Views

Quantum Field Theory I

Quantum Field Theory I

Quantum Field Theory I

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTIONS<br />

vertices<br />

For a theory of one field ϕ, the factor corresponding to the n-leg vertex is 3<br />

n-leg vertex = i ∂n L<br />

∂ϕ n ∣<br />

∣∣∣ϕ=0<br />

δ 4 (p 1 +p 2 +...+p n )<br />

where p i is the momentum corresponding to the i-th leg (all momenta are understood<br />

to be pointing towards the vertex). For a theory with more fields, like<br />

QED, the definition is analogous, e.g. the vertex with l,m and n legs corresponding<br />

to ψ,ψ and A µ -fields respectively, is<br />

(l,m,n)-legs vertex = i<br />

∂ l+m+n L<br />

∂A l µ∂ψ m ∂ψ n ∣<br />

∣∣∣∣fields=0<br />

δ 4 (p 1 +p 2 +...+p l+m+n )<br />

Each functional derivative produces a corresponding leg entering the vertex.<br />

For terms containing space-time derivative of a field, e.g. ∂ µ ϕ, the derivative<br />

with respec to ϕ is defined as 4<br />

∂<br />

∂ϕ ∂ µϕ×something = −ip µ ×something+∂ µ ϕ× ∂<br />

∂ϕ something<br />

where the p µ is the momentum of the leg produced by this functional derivative.<br />

Clearly, examples are called for. In our toy-model given above (the so-called<br />

ϕ 3 -theory) the non-quadratic part of the Lagrangian contains the third power<br />

of the field, so there will be only the 3-leg vertex<br />

¡=i ∂3<br />

∂ϕ 3 (<br />

− g 3! ϕ3) δ 4 (p 1 +p 2 +p 3 ) = −igδ 4 (p 1 +p 2 +p 3 )<br />

In our second example, i.e. in QED, the non-quadratic part of the Lagrangian<br />

is −ψqγ µ A µ ψ, leading to the single vertex<br />

¡=i ∂3( −qψγ µ A µ ψ )<br />

∂ψ∂ψ∂A µ<br />

δ 4 (p 1 +p 2 +p 3 ) = −iqγ µ δ 4 (p 1 +p 2 +p 3 )<br />

and for purely didactic purposes, let us calculate the vertex for the theory with<br />

the non-quadratic Lagrangian −gϕ 2 ∂ µ ϕ∂ µ ϕ<br />

¡=i ∂4<br />

∂ϕ 4 (<br />

−gϕ 2 ∂ µ ϕ∂ µ ϕ ) δ 4 (p 1 +p 2 +p 3 +p 4 )<br />

= −ig ∂3 (<br />

2ϕ∂µ<br />

∂ϕ 3 ϕ∂ µ ϕ−2iϕ 2 p µ 1 ∂ µϕ ) δ 4 (p 1 +p 2 +p 3 +p 4 )<br />

= −ig ∂2 (<br />

2∂µ<br />

∂ϕ 2 ϕ∂ µ ϕ−4iϕp µ 2 ∂ µϕ−4iϕp µ 1 ∂ µϕ−2ϕ 2 p µ 1 p )<br />

2,µ δ 4 (...)<br />

= −i4g ∂<br />

∂ϕ (−ipµ 3 ∂ µϕ−ip µ 2 ∂ µϕ−ϕp 2 p 3 −ip µ 1 ∂ µϕ−ϕp 1 p 3 −ϕp 1 p 2 )δ 4 (...)<br />

= 4ig(p 1 p 2 +p 1 p 3 +p 1 p 4 +p 2 p 3 +p 2 p 4 +p 3 p 4 )δ 4 (p 1 +p 2 +p 3 +p 4 )<br />

3 We could (should) include (2π) 4 on RHS, but we prefer to add this factor elsewhere.<br />

4 ∂<br />

∂<br />

∂µϕ is by definition equal to −ipµ, and the Leibniz rule applies to , as it should<br />

∂ϕ ∂ϕ<br />

apply to anything worthy of the name derivative.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!