18.01.2015 Views

Quantum Field Theory I

Quantum Field Theory I

Quantum Field Theory I

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.1. NAIVE APPROACH 79<br />

green functions<br />

For multiparticle systems, a particularly useful set of initial and final states<br />

is given by the states of particles simultaneously created at various positions,<br />

i.e. by the localized states. But as we have seen already, in the relativistic<br />

QFT the more appropriate states are the quasilocalized ones created by<br />

the field operators. The corresponding amplitude is apparently something like<br />

〈0|ϕ H (⃗x 1 ,t f )ϕ H (⃗x 2 ,t f )...ϕ H (⃗x n ,t i )|0〉. The vacuum state in this amplitude,<br />

however, is not exactly what it should be.<br />

The time-independent state |0〉 in the Heisenberg picture corresponds to a<br />

particular time-evolving state |ψ 0 (t)〉 in the Schrödinger picture, namely to the<br />

one for which |ψ 0 (0)〉 = |0〉. This state contains no particles at the time t = 0.<br />

But the fields ϕ H (⃗x,t i ) should rather act on a different state, namely the one<br />

which contains no particles at the time t i . In the Schrödinger picture such a<br />

state is described byaparticulartime-evolvingstate|ψ i (t)〉 forwhich |ψ i (t i )〉 =<br />

|0〉. How does this state look like in the Heisenberg picture It coincides, by<br />

definition, with |ψ i (0)〉, which is in turn equal to exp{iHt i }|ψ i (t i )〉. It is a<br />

common habit to denote this state in the Heisenberg picture as |0〉 in<br />

and with<br />

this notationn the above cosiderations leads to the following relation<br />

|0〉 in<br />

= e iHti |0〉<br />

In a complete analogy one has to replace the bra-vector 〈0| by<br />

〈0| out<br />

= 〈0|e −iHt f<br />

The quantity of interest is therefore given by the product of fields sandwiched<br />

not between 〈0| and |0〉, but rather<br />

〈0| out<br />

ϕ H (⃗x 1 ,t f )ϕ H (⃗x 2 ,t f )...ϕ H (⃗x n ,t i )|0〉 in<br />

Because of relativity of simultaneity, however, this quantity looks differently<br />

for other observers, namely the time coordinates x 0 i are not obliged to coincide.<br />

These time coordinates, on the other hand, are not completely arbitrary. To any<br />

observerthetimescorrespondingtothesimultaneousfinalstateinoneparticular<br />

frame, must be all greater than the times corresponding to the simultaneous<br />

initial state in this frame. The more appropriate quantity would be a slightly<br />

more general one, namely the time-ordered T-product of fields 9 sandwiched<br />

between 〈0| out<br />

and |0〉 in<br />

〈0| out<br />

T{ϕ H (x 1 )ϕ H (x 2 )...ϕ H (x n )}|0〉 in<br />

The dependence on t i and t f is still present in |0〉 in<br />

and 〈0| out<br />

. It is a common<br />

habit to get rid of this dependence by taking t i = −T and t f = T with T → ∞.<br />

The exact reason for this rather arbitrary step remains unclear until the more<br />

serioustreatment ofthe wholemachinerybecomes availablein the next section).<br />

The above matrix element is almost, but not quite, the Green function —<br />

one of the most prominent quantities in QFT. The missing ingredient is not to<br />

be discussed within this naive approach, where we shall deal with functions<br />

g(x 1 ,...,x n ) = lim<br />

T→∞ 〈0|e−iHT T {ϕ H (x 1 )...ϕ H (x n )}e −iHT |0〉<br />

9 For fields commuting at space-like intervals ([ϕ H (x),ϕ H (y)] = 0 for (x−y) 2 < 0) the time<br />

ordering is immaterial for times which coincide in a particular reference frame. For time-like<br />

intervals, on the other hand, the T-product gives the same ordering in all reference frames.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!