Untitled - Umalusi
Untitled - Umalusi
Untitled - Umalusi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• ensure that there are appropriate security measures in place for the<br />
safekeeping of the examination material;<br />
• establish the state of readiness of the assessment bodies to administer<br />
the October/November 2005 Senior Certificate Examination;<br />
• ensure that processes related to the administration and conduct of the<br />
Senior Certificate Examination are credible;<br />
• ensure that marking is done in a fair manner and is of appropriate and<br />
acceptable standard;<br />
• ensure that the processing and capture of results does not advantage<br />
or disadvantage learners.<br />
4. The approach<br />
<strong>Umalusi</strong> deployed 23 monitors to monitor the conduct of Senior Certificate<br />
Examination. The deployment of monitors took into consideration the<br />
vastness of the province. For example, Limpopo, Eastern Cape,<br />
KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng were each allocated three monitors<br />
whereas other provinces were allocated two monitors each. Each<br />
monitor was required to monitor two schools in a day over three days;<br />
however, the convenors were allocated two days to monitor the writing<br />
phase as one day was reserved for monitoring the design phase.<br />
3. The scope<br />
The monitoring exercise extends across the eleven assessment bodies,<br />
namely, the nine provincial departments of education, the Independent<br />
Examination Board (IEB) and the Beweging vir Christelike Volkseie<br />
Onderwys (BCVO).<br />
All the phases of examination were monitored during the 2005 Senior<br />
Certificate Examinations. <strong>Umalusi</strong> selected a sample of two subjects per<br />
assessment body across all assessment bodies that were tracked from the<br />
monitoring of the design phase through to the capture and processing of<br />
results. The sampling of subjects was informed by the 2004 Senior<br />
Certificate Examination monitoring reports. Subjects that had problems<br />
were tracked. However, some assessment bodies had no problems in<br />
The monitoring exercise started on 09 September 2005 and<br />
ended on 19 December 2005 after the standardization meetings<br />
2004 but the same route was taken to maintain uniformity and to ensure<br />
that that proper systems are in place.<br />
were finalized.<br />
43