19.01.2015 Views

Report on the Implementation of the derogation to ... - Trade Websites

Report on the Implementation of the derogation to ... - Trade Websites

Report on the Implementation of the derogation to ... - Trade Websites

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Final <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

RoO Derogati<strong>on</strong> under <strong>the</strong> PACP-IEPA<br />

As detailed in Secti<strong>on</strong> 6.1, species-based product differentiati<strong>on</strong> is an important dynamic in principal<br />

EU markets. It is also a major element in <strong>the</strong> business strategies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU DWF. Depending up<strong>on</strong><br />

fishing seas<strong>on</strong> by oceanic sub-regi<strong>on</strong>, some fishing firms focus primarily <strong>on</strong> targeting higher priced<br />

yellowfin and o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>on</strong> catching larger quantities <strong>of</strong> less valuable skipjack. For example, in very<br />

general terms, <strong>the</strong> larger boats in <strong>the</strong> Spanish-owned fleet in <strong>the</strong> Western Indian Ocean target<br />

predominantly skipjack through <strong>the</strong>ir operati<strong>on</strong>al focus <strong>on</strong> using man-made fish aggregating devices<br />

(FADs), while <strong>the</strong> French fleet catches proporti<strong>on</strong>ality more yellowfin by setting <strong>the</strong>ir nets <strong>on</strong> freely<br />

swimming schools. 271 It can be safely assumed that yellowfin caught by <strong>the</strong> EU DWF is inserted<br />

predominantly in<strong>to</strong> EU markets because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> price premium that canned yellowfin receives <strong>the</strong>re.<br />

Figure 6.6 EU Canning-grade Tropical Tuna Catch: all regi<strong>on</strong>s, gears, all fishing areas (in t<strong>on</strong>nes),<br />

1950-2009<br />

350,000<br />

300,000<br />

250,000<br />

Spain France* Portugal<br />

T<strong>on</strong>nes<br />

200,000<br />

150,000<br />

100,000<br />

50,000<br />

0<br />

1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005<br />

* Combines catch for Italy (1 Italian-flagged purse seine vessel from 1997 <strong>on</strong>wards)<br />

Notes: Catch data are for bigeye, skipjack and yellowfin. Bigeye tuna are included because juveniles <strong>of</strong> this species are<br />

regularly caught during fishing <strong>on</strong> FADs. Due <strong>to</strong> minimal catch volumes, <strong>the</strong> following EU27 Member states are not<br />

depicted in <strong>the</strong> figure - Bulgaria, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, Poland, Romania, and <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />

Source: FAO Fish StatJ (accessed 14 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2011).<br />

As illustrated in Figure 6.6, <strong>the</strong> main two players in <strong>the</strong> EU DWF are Spain and France. 272 The rapid<br />

drop-<strong>of</strong>f in catches from 2007 is mainly due <strong>to</strong> declining catch rates in <strong>the</strong> Western Indian Ocean<br />

where two main fac<strong>to</strong>rs have affected resource extracti<strong>on</strong>:<br />

1. The activities <strong>of</strong> Somali pirates is a major problem for <strong>the</strong> EU DWF operating <strong>the</strong>re, including<br />

273<br />

attacks <strong>on</strong> and <strong>the</strong> capture <strong>of</strong> EU purse seiners.<br />

271 Campling forthcoming; Guillotreau et al. 2011.<br />

272 Portugal is <strong>on</strong>ly a very minor player and is not assessed in this report.<br />

273 See various issues <strong>of</strong> FFA Fisheries <strong>Trade</strong> News for an overview: http://www.ffa.int/trade_news<br />

Linpico s.a.r.l. Page 135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!