21.01.2015 Views

1.Front section - IUCN

1.Front section - IUCN

1.Front section - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Protected areas and development assistance agencies: at the inter<strong>section</strong> of conservation and development 7<br />

Actions required in the coming<br />

ten years<br />

Integrated conservation and development is intuitively<br />

appealing. It offers something for everyone. It<br />

promises to defuse the major threats to biodiversity,<br />

create better opportunities for people to earn a decent<br />

living and gain access to basic services, and equitably<br />

address the rights and interests of everyone who uses<br />

land and resources in and around protected areas. It is<br />

not a surprise that the integration of conservation and<br />

development has been so easy to sell to a broad range<br />

of interests, from park managers and conservation<br />

organizations, to local communities, governments and<br />

development assistance agencies.<br />

The problem is that the myth of “win-win” solutions<br />

has created a culture in which overly ambitious<br />

projects have proliferated based on weak assumptions<br />

and little evidence. There is no doubt that poverty<br />

reduction and conservation of biodiversity must work<br />

hand-in-hand in today’s world. However, some tradeoffs<br />

must be recognised, and mistakes need to be<br />

avoided for integrated conservation and development<br />

to work in the future. The following features are key to<br />

this success in the coming ten years (adapted from<br />

McShane and Wells, 2004):<br />

1. Clarity about goals and objectives. Biodiversity<br />

goals are often in partial opposition to<br />

development goals and this is rarely explicitly<br />

acknowledged and addressed from the start.<br />

2. Constraints of project structures. The constraints<br />

imposed by the project structures of many<br />

conservation and development agencies are still<br />

inhibiting real engagement with local<br />

stakeholders and preventing the integrated<br />

management of natural resource systems.<br />

3. The scale of intervention. Too many of the<br />

interventions of conservation and development<br />

agencies are scale-specific, often addressing local<br />

symptoms but ignoring underlying policy<br />

constraints or dealing with macro-level issues<br />

while ignoring local realities.<br />

Culture plays an important role in linking conservation and development. Traditional land use practices around Punakha Dzong in Bhutan ensures<br />

the maintenance of riverside habitat for endangered species such as the white-bellied heron.<br />

© Thomas O. McShane<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!