1.Front section - IUCN
1.Front section - IUCN
1.Front section - IUCN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
11<br />
Friends for Life: New partners in support of protected areas<br />
Craft shop in Maasai village, Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania.<br />
© Paul F.J.Eagles<br />
biological, cultural, religious and political – and<br />
provide incentives to support indigenous people’s<br />
traditional customs and values; protect and respect<br />
sacred sites; and enhance the legitimacy of traditional<br />
knowledge. The tourism industry is therefore a critical<br />
component in fostering global support for heritage<br />
conservation, poverty alleviation and community<br />
well-being.<br />
On the other hand, if poorly planned and managed,<br />
the ecological, social and cultural consequences of<br />
tourism can be considerable. Tourism development<br />
that does not aspire to the goals of sustainable<br />
development can contribute to the deterioration of<br />
cultural landscapes, threaten biodiversity, contribute<br />
to pollution and degradation of ecosystems, displace<br />
agricultural land and open spaces, diminish water and<br />
energy resources, and drive poverty deeper into local<br />
communities.<br />
Providing financial support for protected<br />
areas<br />
While national and local governments worldwide<br />
provide the base funding for protected areas, in recent<br />
times, many governments have reduced their funding<br />
support. Tourism is frequently viewed as an alternate<br />
and supplementary source of funding. Income from<br />
visitation and tourism in protected areas can be<br />
generated through donations, entrance and user fees,<br />
levies, concession fees and licences, taxes on retail<br />
purchases by visitors and increased general tax<br />
revenues from economic activity associated with<br />
tourism. Natural resource management agencies can<br />
run their own tourism operations, collecting fees for<br />
entrance, guided tours, camping, accommodation,<br />
sales in shops and cafes. They may also sell licences<br />
and permits to tour companies or contractors to<br />
provide any of these visitor services; provide longterm<br />
leases to tourism operators who develop<br />
infrastructure within protected areas, or have a range<br />
of partnerships, such as public-private transboundary<br />
conserved areas; or private funding of full-time park<br />
staff to run visitor services. The other model that is<br />
increasingly common is private reserves that use<br />
tourism to fund conservation activities on private land.<br />
Private safari parks in Africa, for example, often have<br />
a strong conservation mandate.<br />
Unfortunately, the environmental costs of tourism<br />
development are typically externalized by operators<br />
and visitors wanting access to the resource, and often<br />
place unreasonable expectations on park agencies or<br />
are unaware of the primacy and high cost of<br />
conservation in these places and complain when asked<br />
to make modest financial contributions.<br />
The need for external funding creates pressure for<br />
higher visitation and the granting of more concessions<br />
and licences. This demand raises a number of issues,<br />
144