21.01.2015 Views

1.Front section - IUCN

1.Front section - IUCN

1.Front section - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12<br />

Friends for Life: New partners in support of protected areas<br />

Scotland.<br />

© Jeffrey A. McNeely<br />

In Mexico a federal PA initiative may originate from<br />

NGOs, scientists, or a federal agency. However, to<br />

recruit support at the national level, the process needs<br />

to go through the people. Decisions and actions are<br />

strongly driven by economics and the perception is<br />

that PAs hinder people from meeting basic needs.<br />

However, where nations emphasise clean water, wild<br />

spaces or biological diversity in addition to jobs as<br />

contributing to the quality of life, PAs emerge as an<br />

essential contribution to society as well as the<br />

landscape. Currently PAs in Mexico have a small<br />

amount of political capital. Although virtually every<br />

ecosystem is represented, only eight protected areas<br />

are doing “most of the work.”<br />

Scotland and the Scottish National Heritage<br />

programme use a combination of strategies where<br />

private lands are designated and then the government<br />

pays for certain conservation behaviour. One<br />

designation unique to the United Kingdom including<br />

Scotland, that makes a significant contribution to the<br />

PA system but is not recognised by <strong>IUCN</strong>, are the<br />

Sites of Special Scientific Interest. In addition to the<br />

Scottish national parks, a recent initiative is the EU<br />

Natura 2000 that has identified many natural areas<br />

throughout Europe which are now integrated into the<br />

system and pay particular attention to marine<br />

conservation. This is an example of international<br />

pressure having a positive effect on national nature<br />

protection efforts. At first Natura 2000 had a pure<br />

science base with scientists deciding where and what<br />

to protect. As with many top-down decision making<br />

processes, this approach met some resistance and<br />

resentment, so the process has evolved to include<br />

more community participation.<br />

Local support<br />

Protected area neighbours, indigenous and mobile<br />

peoples, local politicians and communities can be<br />

both potential sources of great support and/or sources<br />

of tremendous conflict for PAs. Often when a PA is<br />

proposed, and most notably when it is a national park,<br />

local residents look to the promise of tourism dollars<br />

and improved infrastructure as their PA gets “on the<br />

map” and government support systems are activated.<br />

As parks expand or local communities strive for<br />

economic growth, the strategy for advocates is to<br />

communicate that those natural resources “locked up”<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!