21.01.2015 Views

1.Front section - IUCN

1.Front section - IUCN

1.Front section - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Extractive industries as a new constituency for protected areas 2<br />

the Vth World Parks Congress called on the global<br />

conservation and development community to set new<br />

targets to enlarge and improve the effectiveness of the<br />

global protected areas system (<strong>IUCN</strong>, 2003), a<br />

recommendation that is reflected in the programme of<br />

work adopted by governments at the seventh<br />

Conference of the Parties to the Convention on<br />

Biological Diversity (2004). As both the protected<br />

area system and mineral exploration continue to<br />

expand, areas of potential conflict are also likely to<br />

increase and the case for the conservation community<br />

to engage the extractive industries becomes more<br />

compelling.<br />

Although it is easy to assume that the extraction of<br />

hydrocarbons and minerals in protected areas would<br />

be legally excluded, the reality is far from simple.<br />

Legislation varies enormously from country to<br />

country. Some governments do not allow mining or<br />

oil and gas development in some of their protected<br />

areas, while others issue exploration permits in<br />

protected areas (Dudley and Stolton, 2003). Despite<br />

these legal differences, environmental campaign<br />

groups, and more recently the investment community<br />

(ten Kate, 2003; Miller, 2003), are invoking the<br />

recommendation made by <strong>IUCN</strong> members at the<br />

2000 World Conservation Congress in Amman,<br />

Jordan to challenge energy and mining companies to<br />

make a voluntary commitment not to enter any <strong>IUCN</strong><br />

category I–IV protected areas.<br />

The “No Go” campaign has heightened the risk to<br />

companies of access to reserves being denied,<br />

restricted, or kept in limbo, and of opposition from<br />

local communities constraining production or<br />

increasing the cost of operating in or near to protected<br />

areas (ten Kate, 2003; Sykes, 2003). One study on the<br />

subject concludes that companies that have assets in<br />

or near existing or planned protected areas could see a<br />

loss of more than 3% of shareholder value (Austin and<br />

Sauer, 2002). Pressure on the industry has resulted in<br />

voluntary restrictions. In 2003, fifteen international<br />

mining companies, that make up the membership of<br />

the International Council for Mining and Metals,<br />

declared a policy not to operate in existing UNESCO<br />

World Heritage Sites (International Council for<br />

Mining and Metals, 2003) a commitment also made<br />

by Shell, an Anglo-Dutch oil company (Shell, 2003).<br />

Yet, if successful, the campaign to force a voluntary<br />

commitment from energy and mining companies not<br />

to explore or produce in or near to protected areas runs<br />

the risk of a Pyhrric victory for conservation.<br />

Governments have to make tough decisions to balance<br />

economic development and environmental protection.<br />

Especially in the developing world, sovereign states<br />

will be reluctant to forego potential revenue from<br />

developing their natural resources and may resist calls<br />

to expand their protected areas system into areas that<br />

have the potential to hold mineral or hydrocarbon<br />

reserves, or choose to delineate boundaries to exclude<br />

mineralized zones.<br />

Furthermore, a strategy that seeks only to oppose<br />

the commercial sector risks losing sight of the benefits<br />

for conservation that can be made available through<br />

collaboration. Companies in the extractive industries<br />

sector own or control many resources that, if<br />

harnessed, can be used to expand and strengthen the<br />

protected area estate. The remainder of this chapter<br />

gives examples of energy and mining companies that<br />

have provided financial, human, management and<br />

planning, scientific, and political resources for the<br />

support of protected areas.<br />

Examples of contributions to<br />

protected areas from the<br />

extractive industries sector<br />

Financial contributions<br />

Budgets for protected areas have not risen<br />

commensurately with the rapid growth in their<br />

number. Recent studies estimate that an additional<br />

US$2.3 billion each year is required simply to make<br />

management adequate in the existing protected area<br />

network (James et al., cited in Lapham and<br />

Livermore, 2003). Financial resources necessary to<br />

create and manage a broadly representative and<br />

effective global system of protected areas are upwards<br />

of US$20 billion annually (Balmford et al., cited in<br />

Lapham and Livermore, 2003). Because the project<br />

life cycles of oil, gas, and mineral development<br />

projects span many years, or even decades, there is a<br />

tremendous opportunity for companies to provide a<br />

sustainable flow of funding to protected areas over the<br />

long term.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!