The-Complete-Neruda-Interviews-1-5
The-Complete-Neruda-Interviews-1-5
The-Complete-Neruda-Interviews-1-5
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> Third Interview of Dr. Jamisson <strong>Neruda</strong><br />
WingmakersTM<br />
physics, cosmology, and mathematics, is partial at best, and completely inaccurate at<br />
worst.”<br />
Sarah: “Well, that leaves us essentially nowhere, doesn’t it If what you’ve said tonight<br />
is just partial understanding or complete misjudgment, where does that leave our<br />
brightest scientists and theologians You have all the advantages of advanced<br />
technology and alien cosmology, and still you can’t explain the universe with any<br />
confidence. Even with your proof of God, you claim to know essentially nothing that’s<br />
absolutely true. How can that be”<br />
Dr. <strong>Neruda</strong>: “No one who’s invested in astronomy, cosmology, or physics likes to<br />
think that their discipline is misguided by false or incomplete assumptions. But they<br />
are. And there’s a good reason.”<br />
Sarah: “Which is”<br />
Dr. <strong>Neruda</strong>: “Imagine that the observable universe is the middle rung on a ladder of<br />
unknown length. Each of the rungs above and below our observable universe<br />
represents an order of magnitude beyond our senses. For example, let’s say that the<br />
rung above the one that represents our observable universe is the outer perimeter of<br />
our Milk Way galaxy. Using a telescope we can see the next rung above us, but the rest<br />
of the ladder is lost in a thick haze.<br />
“Looking downward—at a microscopic level with an electron microscope—we can add<br />
another rung below our observable universe, and with a particle accelerator, we can<br />
even theorize what the next rung below that might be, but the rest of the ladder trails<br />
downward into a thick haze no different than when we try to look up.<br />
“With all of our technology and theory, we still have no idea how tall the ladder is or<br />
even whether the ladder is straight or begins to curve like a double helix. We don’t<br />
know if perhaps the top end of the ladder curves to such a degree that it actually<br />
connects with the bottom end of the ladder. And we don’t even know whether there<br />
might be additional ladders.”<br />
Sarah: “Okay, I think I know where you’re going with this, but then why does it always<br />
seem that science knows more than they really do”<br />
Dr. <strong>Neruda</strong>: “<strong>The</strong> largest population of the planet—perhaps 99 percent—has no<br />
experience beyond the middle rung of the ladder. And those that are privileged to<br />
observe the next rung above or below by the use of technology, falsely assume, or<br />
perhaps hope, that the ladder retains the same form and holds to the same principles.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> ACIO has observed another rung of this ladder—beyond the technology of<br />
academia. Nothing more. However, in doing so, we’ve only become humbled by the<br />
depth and breadth of our ignorance. We’ve learned that the ladder does change. It<br />
Page | 114