23.01.2015 Views

The-Complete-Neruda-Interviews-1-5

The-Complete-Neruda-Interviews-1-5

The-Complete-Neruda-Interviews-1-5

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> Fifth Interview of Dr. Jamisson <strong>Neruda</strong><br />

WingmakersTM<br />

“If you feel that the best way to serve truth is to protest, resist, build awareness about what<br />

is happening in the world, then do that, but I would recommend doing it from a nonpolarity<br />

perspective. You can’t fight separation with more separation, it will only polarize.<br />

It’s important to feel that you are standing up, not in fear or some other programmed<br />

emotion, but that you are aligned to your life essence and in expression of that source within<br />

you, even when you protest.<br />

“Others may prefer to undergo the Sovereign Integral process and focus on this more<br />

internal stratagem. <strong>The</strong>re is no formula here, and certainly you can do both. But to know this<br />

information and then remain passive—a pure observer—is a programmed response, and<br />

that is not an answer to ‘how do I best serve truth’ It is a denial of truth.”<br />

Sarah: “You mentioned earlier that the Anunnaki lent their DNA to the Human 2.0. It<br />

suggests then that their DNA would be present in a lot of us. Is that the case”<br />

Dr. <strong>Neruda</strong>: “This is a very complicated subject. Yes, according to the WingMakers, the<br />

Anunnaki, in an attempt to enhance human DNA, conducted, what we would call today, in<br />

vitro fertilization experiments with human women. <strong>The</strong>y wanted their DNA to create a<br />

subspecies that could endure generationally to produce loyalists. <strong>The</strong> Sirians did the same<br />

thing. In terms of DNA tendencies, the Anunnaki were conquerors, and the Sirian progeny<br />

were colonists. That’s being very general, admittedly, but in broad terms that was the nature<br />

of their bloodlines, when compared to their human counterparts.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> DNA template for Human 2.0 was Anunnaki, but it had been altered. This is where<br />

the subject gets complicated. <strong>The</strong> Anunnaki are not physical beings. <strong>The</strong>y did not exist in<br />

three-dimensional density as we know it today. <strong>The</strong> earth, 500,000 years ago, was a very<br />

different place in terms of its density and the gravitational fields that bathed it. <strong>The</strong><br />

Anunnaki were interdimensional beings, meaning they are infinite just as we are, but without<br />

the physical body. However, all beings possess DNA. It’s the quantum equivalent of a<br />

blueprint. So they experimented with how to use their DNA to create physical beings that<br />

could function in accordance to their agenda, which as I said, was initially mining gold, but<br />

later turned to the enslavement of a species who would worship Anu.<br />

“When the Anunnaki fertilized human women it was with royal bloodlines, and this was not<br />

a coincidence. <strong>The</strong>y wanted these royal bloodlines to sustain over thousands of generations<br />

so they could more easily facilitate their master plans on earth.”<br />

Sarah: “Was this a nationalistic thing”<br />

Dr. <strong>Neruda</strong>: “How do you mean that”<br />

Sarah: “Were Anunnaki bloodlines mostly Arab, Jewish, or Gentile Were there certain<br />

characteristics that were noticeable in the physical body”<br />

Dr. <strong>Neruda</strong>: “<strong>The</strong> Anunnaki bloodlines were initially Babylonian and Egyptian, but they<br />

have spread into nearly all races. It probably wouldn’t be an overstatement to say that nearly<br />

every person on the planet today has some fractional percentage of Anunnaki royal DNA.”<br />

Page | 236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!