The-Complete-Neruda-Interviews-1-5
The-Complete-Neruda-Interviews-1-5
The-Complete-Neruda-Interviews-1-5
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> Fourth Interview of Dr. Jamisson <strong>Neruda</strong><br />
WingmakersTM<br />
Dr. <strong>Neruda</strong>: “Yes.”<br />
Sarah: “But you’re not telling me that other organizations aren’t worried about World War<br />
III or Armageddon, however you define it. Right”<br />
Dr. <strong>Neruda</strong>: “Every nation’s leadership is concerned about these issues, but it’s by no<br />
means the focus of their agenda. It is a small, compartmentalized component of their<br />
agenda.<br />
“This is precisely why Fifteen is involved with the Incunabula’s planners, the threats to the<br />
human race are both real and persistent, and with each passing decade the conditions are<br />
only growing more fertile for fragmentation and chaos—the very kind you would observe in<br />
tribal warfare. <strong>The</strong>re is no fundamental difference.”<br />
Sarah: “And the leaders of the Military Force know about this objective”<br />
Dr. <strong>Neruda</strong>: “No. <strong>The</strong>y have their own agenda, which is related, but quite different as well.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y don’t aspire to regulate oil production; they intend to defend its availability and<br />
influence its price as a result. <strong>The</strong>y’re not concerned with globalization as it relates to<br />
economic or cultural platforms, but rather, they’re concerned with exporting democracy in<br />
order to ensure stabilization in the region, and eradicate instability in the form of terrorists<br />
and dictators alike.”<br />
Sarah: “But that seems at odds with everything I’ve heard about the military.”<br />
Dr. <strong>Neruda</strong>: “In what way”<br />
Sarah: “You make it sound as though the Military Force is trying to bring stability or peace,<br />
when everything I’ve ever read implies that the military feeds off of conflict and instability. If<br />
the world is at peace, then the military becomes a simple police force, its power is reduced<br />
and its budgets are slashed.”<br />
Dr. <strong>Neruda</strong>: “I understand your question. However, the Military Force is not the same<br />
thing as the military. While it is very pro-military, it operates in a longer planning horizon<br />
than military personnel. <strong>The</strong> Military Force is made up of high-level politicians, business<br />
people, intelligence members, academics, think tanks, and so on. Its members are from the<br />
United Kingdom, America, Germany, Canada, Australia, Israel, and many other countries.<br />
Its cohesion, as a group, is not so much a function of formal structure and meetings, but<br />
rather it’s by publishing classified papers that are shared among its elite members. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
papers define the platform, goals, long-term objectives, and essentially map out the strategy<br />
and tactics by which the Military Force intends to execute its plan.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> Military Force is working on hybrid defensive and offensive weapons that relate to<br />
space, bio-weapons, the Internet, and other environments that are as yet not viewed as<br />
battlefield arenas. <strong>The</strong>y would contend that R & D budgets should be increased in order to<br />
develop these new weapons in order to secure the rights of free people to live without fear<br />
Page | 143