25.01.2015 Views

updated planning report updated planning report - City of Guelph

updated planning report updated planning report - City of Guelph

updated planning report updated planning report - City of Guelph

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Updated Planning Report September 2008<br />

Proposed Lafarge/Silvercreek Development<br />

5.3 Supplementary Stormwater Management Study<br />

As previously noted, a supplementary analysis <strong>of</strong> stormwater management (SWM)<br />

requirements was necessitated by the technical questions and concerns <strong>of</strong> both the <strong>City</strong><br />

and the GRCA regarding the initial stormwater work and proposed facility, particularly in<br />

relation to upstream and downstream flows and impacts on Howitt Creek, and the<br />

related adequacy <strong>of</strong> the proposed pond.<br />

As a result, Silvercreek retained TSH to independently determine design flows for Howitt<br />

Creek from the upstream lands (via the Alma Street Relief Sewer), and to provide a<br />

preliminary design <strong>of</strong> a stormwater management facility to control those flows to the<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> the downstream system.<br />

The result <strong>of</strong> this additional analysis show that substantially higher flows enter Howitt<br />

Creek from the Alma Street Relief Sewer than has been calculated under previous<br />

analyses. Accordingly, TSH concludes that a larger stormwater detention facility is<br />

required (compared to previous studies) in the area east <strong>of</strong> the creek, in order to “…limit<br />

the Howitt Creek flows to suit the capacity <strong>of</strong> the Waterloo Avenue culvert…” which is on<br />

Howitt Creek downstream <strong>of</strong> the site. Under major (100-year) storm conditions, the<br />

proposed SWM pond would occupy the majority <strong>of</strong> the subject site east <strong>of</strong> the creek.<br />

A separate stormwater management <strong>report</strong> (dated August 2008) has been prepared by<br />

TSH to document the above supplementary analysis and resultant recommended SWM<br />

facility. That <strong>report</strong> was submitted to the <strong>City</strong> and the GRCA under separate cover, as<br />

this <strong>planning</strong> <strong>report</strong> was being written.<br />

5.4 Environmental Impact Studies<br />

The original application submission in 2005 was supported, among other <strong>report</strong>s, by an<br />

Environmental Impact Study (EIS) prepared by North-South Environmental (NSE). It<br />

has subsequently been augmented by a series <strong>of</strong> addenda <strong>report</strong>s, intended to address<br />

both the revised development concept and various technical issues and agency<br />

comments arising during the application review process. Because the addenda,<br />

including the latest (# IV, very recently submitted to the <strong>City</strong> and agencies) mostly<br />

supplement rather than replace the original 2005 EIS, this synopsis provides a brief<br />

overview <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> these EIS <strong>report</strong>s.<br />

5.4.1 EIS, October 2005<br />

This initial “base” EIS document provided the original comprehensive environmental<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> the site and original development proposal, in response to terms <strong>of</strong><br />

reference which were jointly developed with the concerned agencies, most notably the<br />

<strong>City</strong> and GRCA.<br />

The objectives <strong>of</strong> this study were stated as follows:<br />

• collect background information on environmental features;<br />

• map and classify vegetation community boundaries;<br />

• map the location <strong>of</strong> significant species and other features;<br />

• identify impacts and mitigation; and,<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!