27.01.2015 Views

228776e

228776e

228776e

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INDIA<br />

The sample<br />

The sample is based on five textbooks published between 1995 and 2006. Three of these<br />

are designed for world history (T1), Indian history (T2) or Indian and world history (T4), the<br />

other two for social studies in India (T5) and in India and the world (T3). The books devoted<br />

to India accord no special status to the Holocaust and mention it only in passing in relation<br />

to the Second World War or not at all; history books treat the Holocaust within sections<br />

dealing with the Second World War, focusing mainly on historical processes, actors, the<br />

rise of Nazism and Hitler, and consequences of Nazism and the war. The curriculum does<br />

not prescribe teaching about the Holocaust.<br />

Scale<br />

Maps showing locations of concentration camps and photographs of cities and buildings<br />

clearly locate the events in Europe in T1 and T3. T4 also locates the events in Europe in its<br />

text. Further reference to exiled Jewish scientists in the United States (T4) and to Gandhi’s<br />

letters to Hitler appealing for an end to the violence indirectly highlight the global dimension<br />

of the Holocaust. The thematic contexts of the chapters in T1, T3 and T4 place the Holocaust<br />

in a global context, with reference to nationalism only in general terms. While three of<br />

the five textbooks (T1, T3, T4) focus clearly on 1941 as the moment at which the violence<br />

became extreme, T1 also dates the ‘machinery of terror’ (incorrectly) from 1934, while only<br />

T3 provides details of discrimination from 1933 onwards, the effects of the Nuremberg laws<br />

of 1935 and the creation of ghettos. T3’s mention of the influence of Spencer and Darwin on<br />

racial ideology effectively extends the roots of the Holocaust back to the nineteenth century.<br />

The same textbook documents commemorations of the Holocaust in the present day, in<br />

diaries, memoirs, museums, diaries and literature.<br />

Protagonists<br />

A broad spectrum of perpetrators and victims is named. Priority is given to groups of<br />

protagonists, named as ‘Nazis’ or fascists, but also to ‘armed volunteers’ and ‘brownshirts’<br />

(T1 and T4), to the ‘Hitler Youth’, gestapo, SS, SD and SA. ‘Germany’ is named as the<br />

perpetrator of the genocide (T3). Victims are named as Jews (T2), and as communists,<br />

social democrats, innocent civilians, Jews, disabled people, ‘Gypsies’, blacks, communists,<br />

trade union leaders and social democrats (T3) . Three of the books state that six million<br />

Jews were murdered, while T3 adds 200,000 ‘Gypsies’, 1 million Polish civilians, 70,000<br />

disabled and old people and political opponents of Nazism. T1 also mentions victims of<br />

slave labour, (inaccurately, two million) prisoners of war and slave labour. Nazi stereotypes<br />

are discussed in T1 and T3. Other types of involvement mentioned include the passive<br />

role of bystanders (T3), allied resistance (T1), and German and Italian resistance (T4).<br />

The depiction of the relations between perpetrators and victims is confined to violence<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!