27.01.2015 Views

228776e

228776e

228776e

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

URUGUAY<br />

The sample<br />

The sample contains one history textbook published in 2009 and designed for fifteen-yearold<br />

pupils studying history. The textbook is divided into sections devoted to global history,<br />

Latin American history and the history of Uruguay. It deals more specifically with the<br />

Holocaust in a section entitled ‘The World 1930-1945’, within which further sub-chapters<br />

are called ‘Racism and Other Forms of Discrimination’, ‘Fascism, Francoism and Japanese<br />

Nationalism in the 1930s’ and ‘The Consolidation of Nazism’. One page is devoted to the<br />

Holocaust, while its context is treated over a further fifteen pages.<br />

Scale<br />

Although the section addresses world history from 1930 to 1945, the Holocaust is explained<br />

only as a short-term phenomenon without connections to this broader period. It is qualified<br />

spatially as a German event in a section called ‘Great Germany’ (Gran Alemania), with<br />

further references to the sites of camps in Auschwitz, Treblinka and Dachau (which is the<br />

subject of one photograph).<br />

Protagonists<br />

Perpetrators are presented as ‘Paramilitary Nazi Forces’ (Fuerzas Paramilitares Nazis)<br />

within a text box, while the SS and SA are described as ‘violent groups’, alongside the<br />

Gestapo, the industrial middle class, the military, the Hitler Youth, the Nazi regime and<br />

the ‘totalitarian’ state. Rudolf Höss is quoted in order to explain the camp system, while<br />

Hitler features prominently on the basis of a quotation from Mein Kampf and because<br />

responsibility for perpetration is largely ascribed to him, as in the phrase ‘Hitler considered<br />

Jews, Slavs and Gypsies to be inferior groups, although it was against the first group<br />

that he applied a policy of persecution and destruction’ (p. 137). The term ‘Der Führer’ is<br />

incorrectly translated into Spanish as el conductor (the driver). In addition to Jews, Slavs<br />

and ‘Gypsies’, the textbook defines Anne Frank inaccurately as an ‘opponent of the Nazi<br />

regime’ (p. 140), and refers to ‘fifty-five million war victims, of which six million were Jews’<br />

(p. 145). Neither the role of the Allies nor collaborators nor Jewish life before 1933 or after<br />

1945 is mentioned. Bystanders are alluded to in a caption accompanying a photograph of a<br />

passer-by in front of a broken shop window following the November pogrom, which states<br />

that attacks on shops had ‘not provoked overt rejection among the German population’<br />

(p. 137).<br />

Interpretative paradigms<br />

The Holocaust is defined in terms of racial violence (with reference to the work of Olivier<br />

Wieviorka, p. 127), genocide, destruction and Auschwitz, while neither the terms Holocaust<br />

nor Shoah is used. Types of killing are treated in detail, while central aspects of historical<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!