27.01.2015 Views

228776e

228776e

228776e

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Interpretative paradigms<br />

All textbooks except T4 use the terms holocausto and genocidio. Other references include<br />

‘physical extermination of the Jews’ (T1), ‘extermination’, ‘massacre’, ‘total dehumanization’<br />

(T2) or ‘genocide of the Jewish population’ (T2) or of ‘the Jews’ (T5). A wide range of documents<br />

includes photographs, posters, maps, propaganda, paintings, historical publications, film<br />

stills and caricatures. The treatment of terminology, ideology, camps and types of persecution<br />

is generally thorough, though not consistent. T5 proceeds chronologically, for example,<br />

while T4 focuses mainly on camps; T2 deals with the events primarily in the form of didactic<br />

exercises, and T1, T3 and T4 do so within thematic boxes set aside from the main text and<br />

discussing ‘genocide and deportations’ and ‘education for subhumans’ (T1), the ‘Nuremberg<br />

Trials’ (T3) and ‘concentration camps’ (T4). T1, T2 and T3 contextualize the Holocaust within<br />

the Second World War; T4 illustrates the event by focusing on Auschwitz, while T5 relativizes<br />

the event in relation to fascism in general. More explicit explanations of the causes of the<br />

Holocaust are political (where the Holocaust is ascribed indirectly to a constitutional fault<br />

under the Weimar Republic in T2 and T4), economic (T1, T2, T3 and T5), racial (all books), or<br />

else framed in terms of totalitarianism (T3 and T4), territorial expansionism (T1, T2 and T5)<br />

and/or Hitler’s personal will (T2 and T5). Nonetheless, neither individual perpetrators (except<br />

Hitler in T2 and T5) nor victims (except Primo Levi in T3) play a central role in the narratives;<br />

explanations of motivations of perpetrators or bystanders are correspondingly sparse, and<br />

are confined to references to people’s fear of repression or of the German population. T4<br />

and T5 correspondingly explain the event in terms of rationalization, that is, as a result of the<br />

exact planning of the functions of camps. The books contain between two and eight images<br />

and a number of iconic images such as the yellow star and book burning (T1), emaciated<br />

prisoners or survivors (T2, T3, T4 and T5) and the boycotting of shops (T5). Images of victims<br />

are generally black and white, while those of perpetrators are in colour, and some captions<br />

are omitted in T5. The textbooks contain several complex metanarratives engaging with the<br />

memory or transmission of knowledge about the Holocaust via a section about education<br />

under the Nazi regime (T1 and T2), quotations from Michael Burleigh, Daniel Goldhagen<br />

and the Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948<br />

and a still from Charlie Chaplin’s film The Great Dictator (T2), the Nuremberg Trials (T3),<br />

photographs of Yad Vashem (T4) and an extract from the Auschwitz memorial guidebook (T5).<br />

T2 addresses the utility of fostering memory of ‘extreme human brutality’, and T4 requires<br />

pupils to search the internet and write down their opinion about the current function of the<br />

Yad Vashem memorial.<br />

Narrative structure and point of view<br />

The proportion of space devoted to authorial text varies considerably, from 15 percent in T5<br />

and 20 percent in T3 to 50 percent in T4, 60 percent in T1 and 70 percent in T2. Despite this,<br />

all books provide multiple viewpoints via historical documents, except perhaps T4, which<br />

provides only visual documentation in the form of maps and photographs. All authors use<br />

the passive mode, avoid emotive language (only T4 and T5 contain judgmental adjectives),<br />

143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!