Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...
Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...
Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
For Official Use Only<br />
<strong>Test<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> a Jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>Environment</strong> <strong>Roadmap</strong><br />
2.3.2.3 CORE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPABILITY<br />
The objective core <strong>in</strong>frastructure will provide the capability essential to generate the jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
mission environment that is needed for T&E <strong>in</strong> all jo<strong>in</strong>t mission areas. The core <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />
capabilities <strong>in</strong>clude a persistent data transport capability, common middleware, basic object<br />
models, tools and utilities, a data archive capability, and a reuse repository. A major<br />
enhancement to the current JDEP, address<strong>in</strong>g these requirements, has been fully studied<br />
separately by USD(AT&L) and the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA). All the<br />
elements of a program plan that support the roadmap's recommendations are available separately.<br />
Technical details are provided <strong>in</strong> Appendix B. This required core <strong>in</strong>frastructure is the most<br />
resource-<strong>in</strong>tensive element needed to achieve the vision of test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a jo<strong>in</strong>t environment.<br />
2.3.2.4 SYSTEM/THREAT/ENVIRONMENT REPRESENTATIONS<br />
Current validated and accredited models and simulations are crucial to be able to conduct<br />
realistic and adequate T&E. The USD(AT&L), with other Office of the Secretary of Defense<br />
(OSD) offices, the Services, and Defense Agencies, must cont<strong>in</strong>ue work associated with the<br />
proposed recommendations under the SPG task [E17e] for Reformed Acquisition Management.<br />
Those proposals called for better leverag<strong>in</strong>g of M&S for capability-based acquisition, and<br />
enabl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased test capability for systems and systems-of-systems <strong>in</strong> a jo<strong>in</strong>t environment<br />
with greater use of M&S. The USD(AT&L)-led Acquisition M&S Work<strong>in</strong>g Group shall develop<br />
an Acquisition Model<strong>in</strong>g and Simulation Master Plan that will address the development or<br />
update, validation, and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of models and simulations to ensure needed virtual and<br />
constructive threat and system representations, as well as standard, readily available simulation<br />
environments. The Group will make recommendations to the USD(AT&L) regard<strong>in</strong>g fund<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
support systems eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and T&E M&S requirements. Further, the Department must assure<br />
appropriate Department or commercial standards are agreed upon to facilitate needed shar<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
reuse, and <strong>in</strong>teroperability of M&S <strong>in</strong> systems eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and test activity. The USD(AT&L)<br />
shall add DOT&E to the membership of the DoD Executive Council for Model<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
Simulation (EXCIMS) and task that body to oversee the coord<strong>in</strong>ation and implementation of all<br />
M&S actions related to test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a jo<strong>in</strong>t environment.<br />
Program managers must be able to "plug" the warfight<strong>in</strong>g capabilities under test <strong>in</strong>to a<br />
representative jo<strong>in</strong>t mission <strong>in</strong>frastructure that provides sufficient <strong>in</strong>teraction with the cluster of<br />
needed systems and threat forces <strong>in</strong> appropriate scenarios to meet their test objectives. Although<br />
there are many ways to categorize the various systems <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the jo<strong>in</strong>t mission<br />
<strong>in</strong>frastructure, this roadmap organizes them <strong>in</strong>to three major categories: system representations;<br />
threat representations; and environment representations. Specifics are discussed <strong>in</strong> Appendix B.<br />
While new systems developed to JCIDS requirements may be compelled to design their<br />
models and <strong>in</strong>terfaces to be compatible with the jo<strong>in</strong>t mission environment, legacy systems and<br />
those already <strong>in</strong> development haven’t been subject to the same requirement. These systems are<br />
21<br />
For Official Use Only