Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...
Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...
Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
For Official Use Only<br />
<strong>Test<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> a Jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>Environment</strong> <strong>Roadmap</strong><br />
environment; determ<strong>in</strong>e if thresholds <strong>in</strong> the approved CPD and critical operational issues have<br />
been satisfied; and assess impacts to combat operations.<br />
DoD Interim Acquisition Guidebook. Recommend that the acquisition guidebook be<br />
changed to provide that jo<strong>in</strong>t mission T&E requirements be identified <strong>in</strong> Test and Evaluation<br />
Master Plans (TEMPs) and that, <strong>in</strong> situations <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g multi-Service participation, all applicable<br />
Service OTA commanders are expected to coord<strong>in</strong>ate dur<strong>in</strong>g review and approval of the TEMP.<br />
TENA Implementation Directive. A draft DoD TENA Directive is be<strong>in</strong>g prepared under<br />
the auspices of the Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Initiative Council to make TENA the standard architecture for test<br />
and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g range systems <strong>in</strong>teroperability. Recommend this directive be completed and issued<br />
by FY2005.<br />
JDEP Utilization, Management and Operation Directive. A JDEP Utilization,<br />
Management and Operation Directive may be appropriate to govern JDEP compliance and its<br />
management and operations as a central Department-wide systems eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and test<strong>in</strong>g<br />
capability. Recommend the need for such a directive be reviewed dur<strong>in</strong>g implementation<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g, and if needed, prepared and issued by FY2006.<br />
C.3.2 Requirements/Capabilities Generation<br />
Changes to the CJCS 3170 series for the Jo<strong>in</strong>t Capabilities Integration and Development<br />
System (JCIDS) are essential to ensure the CDD and CPD documents conta<strong>in</strong>, or reference the<br />
source for, the explicit mission capability needed, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the jo<strong>in</strong>t mission requirement.<br />
CJCSI 3170.01D. The follow<strong>in</strong>g suggested changes are provided as examples:<br />
Paragraph. 4. Policy, Subparagraph 4.c., Recommend the follow<strong>in</strong>g additions to the first two<br />
sentences: New solution sets must be crafted to deliver technologically sound, testable,<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>able, and affordable <strong>in</strong>crements of militarily useful capability. All capabilities shall be<br />
developed, tested, and procured to leverage the unique attributes of other DoD Components,<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational systems from allies and cooperative opportunities.<br />
Enclosure A - Jo<strong>in</strong>t Capabilities Integration And Development System (JCIDS) Process,<br />
Subparagraph 2e. Def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Capabilities., Suggest add<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g word<strong>in</strong>g to subparagraph<br />
2.e.(2): (2) Capability def<strong>in</strong>itions should be general enough so as not to prejudice decisions <strong>in</strong><br />
favor of a particular means of implementation, but specific enough to evaluate alternative<br />
approaches to implement the capability and provide for measurement of system performance<br />
through the T&E process for the lifecycle of the system.<br />
C-4<br />
For Official Use Only<br />
Appendix C