Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...
Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...
Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
For Official Use Only<br />
<strong>Test<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> a Jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>Environment</strong> <strong>Roadmap</strong><br />
Appendix B – Needed Infrastructure<br />
B.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
It is seldom practical, and rarely affordable, to create a live test environment with all<br />
elements of a jo<strong>in</strong>t mission. Any set of jo<strong>in</strong>t missions will be complex because of the numbers<br />
and variety of combat systems and geographic space <strong>in</strong>volved.<br />
B.2 REQUIRED CAPABILITY<br />
The <strong>in</strong>frastructure solution is to create the network<strong>in</strong>g capability that effectively <strong>in</strong>tegrates<br />
live systems and forces with virtual and constructive representations of other necessary elements<br />
to generate a realistic test environment for the system(s) be<strong>in</strong>g tested. This <strong>in</strong>frastructure will<br />
provide a persistent, repeatable, operationally realistic jo<strong>in</strong>t mission environment <strong>in</strong> a timely and<br />
cost-effective manner for systems eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, test<strong>in</strong>g, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, and experimentation. To<br />
conduct a test event <strong>in</strong> a coherent and realistic jo<strong>in</strong>t operational context, three key elements must<br />
exist: def<strong>in</strong>ed jo<strong>in</strong>t missions; a core networked <strong>in</strong>frastructure that l<strong>in</strong>ks LVC capabilities; and the<br />
LVC representations of the needed systems, threat, and physical environment.<br />
B.2.1 FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITY DESCRIPTION<br />
The process for plann<strong>in</strong>g for test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a jo<strong>in</strong>t mission environment will be similar to T&E<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g today. Planners will develop the PM’s T&E strategy and design tests for the system<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of other friendly <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g systems, the threat environment, and the<br />
physical environment necessary to def<strong>in</strong>e the mission environment and achieve specific test<br />
objectives. A persistent, repeatable, operationally realistic networked <strong>in</strong>frastructure will provide<br />
the ability to create much more complex and realistic test environments than are currently<br />
available.<br />
Figure B.1 is an overview of the common jo<strong>in</strong>t mission <strong>in</strong>frastructure. The top layer<br />
illustrates the library of available virtual and constructive representations that, l<strong>in</strong>ked together,<br />
provide for generation of the required mission environments. Each additional layer represents a<br />
specific mission environment. Work<strong>in</strong>g from a persistent <strong>in</strong>frastructure of connectivity, common<br />
data exchange middleware, data description standards, common archiv<strong>in</strong>g, configuration and<br />
execution tools, test planners will be able to select from the library of virtual and constructive<br />
resources to supplement available live systems. System availability and required fidelity will<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>e the appropriate comb<strong>in</strong>ation of LVC representation. Use of this <strong>in</strong>frastructure will<br />
permit rapid, facile and cost efficient creation and execution of tests over a full range of required<br />
test environments.<br />
B-1<br />
For Official Use Only<br />
Appendix B