Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...
Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...
Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
For Official Use Only<br />
<strong>Test<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> a Jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>Environment</strong> <strong>Roadmap</strong><br />
Systems<br />
Under<br />
Test<br />
Jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>Operational</strong> Scenarios<br />
Integrated<br />
Capabilities<br />
Virtual<br />
Prototype<br />
Hardware<br />
<strong>in</strong> the<br />
Loop<br />
Lab<br />
Installed<br />
Systems<br />
Test<br />
Facility<br />
Range<br />
<strong>Environment</strong><br />
Generator<br />
Threat<br />
Systems<br />
Standard,<br />
Reliable<br />
Software<br />
Auto-code<br />
Generated I/F<br />
Common<br />
Middleware<br />
Auto-code<br />
Generated I/F<br />
Common<br />
Middleware<br />
Auto-code<br />
Generated I/F<br />
Common<br />
Middleware<br />
Auto-code<br />
Generated I/F<br />
Common<br />
Middleware<br />
Auto-code<br />
Generated I/F<br />
Common<br />
Middleware<br />
Auto-code<br />
Generated I/F<br />
Common<br />
Middleware<br />
Persistent<br />
Connectivity<br />
Event<br />
Control<br />
Common<br />
Middleware<br />
Utilities &<br />
Reuse<br />
Repository<br />
Reuse<br />
Repository<br />
Federated<br />
Data<br />
Archive<br />
Scenarios /<br />
Test Procedures<br />
Event Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Utilities<br />
Object Model<br />
Utilities<br />
Figure B.3. Notional Jo<strong>in</strong>t Mission Infrastructure<br />
B.2.2 JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENTS<br />
To effectively test a system <strong>in</strong> a jo<strong>in</strong>t context, the jo<strong>in</strong>t mission environments <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
system must be def<strong>in</strong>ed to the degree that the prerequisite associated warfight<strong>in</strong>g systems can be<br />
identified. In addition, operationally realistic, representative scenarios should also exist<br />
describ<strong>in</strong>g the CONOPS and JTTPs, as well as necessary <strong>in</strong>formation or services that must be<br />
exchanged to satisfy the <strong>in</strong>teroperability (for legacy systems) or publish/subscribe requirements<br />
(for net-centric systems). F<strong>in</strong>ally, test procedures, derived from the evaluation needs, will be<br />
produced to capture and def<strong>in</strong>e all the necessary systems and their configurations, the data<br />
collection po<strong>in</strong>ts and archiv<strong>in</strong>g strategy, the event timel<strong>in</strong>e, and any other necessary<br />
configuration <strong>in</strong>formation so that the test could be repeated by a different test team.<br />
B.2.3 CORE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPABILITY<br />
The objective core <strong>in</strong>frastructure will provide the capability essential to generate the jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
mission environment that is needed for T&E <strong>in</strong> all jo<strong>in</strong>t mission areas. The core <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />
capabilities <strong>in</strong>clude a persistent data transport capability, common middleware, basic object<br />
B-4<br />
For Official Use Only<br />
Appendix B