27.01.2015 Views

Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...

Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...

Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap - U.S. Army Operational ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For Official Use Only<br />

<strong>Test<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> a Jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>Environment</strong> <strong>Roadmap</strong><br />

Systems<br />

Under<br />

Test<br />

Jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>Operational</strong> Scenarios<br />

Integrated<br />

Capabilities<br />

Virtual<br />

Prototype<br />

Hardware<br />

<strong>in</strong> the<br />

Loop<br />

Lab<br />

Installed<br />

Systems<br />

Test<br />

Facility<br />

Range<br />

<strong>Environment</strong><br />

Generator<br />

Threat<br />

Systems<br />

Standard,<br />

Reliable<br />

Software<br />

Auto-code<br />

Generated I/F<br />

Common<br />

Middleware<br />

Auto-code<br />

Generated I/F<br />

Common<br />

Middleware<br />

Auto-code<br />

Generated I/F<br />

Common<br />

Middleware<br />

Auto-code<br />

Generated I/F<br />

Common<br />

Middleware<br />

Auto-code<br />

Generated I/F<br />

Common<br />

Middleware<br />

Auto-code<br />

Generated I/F<br />

Common<br />

Middleware<br />

Persistent<br />

Connectivity<br />

Event<br />

Control<br />

Common<br />

Middleware<br />

Utilities &<br />

Reuse<br />

Repository<br />

Reuse<br />

Repository<br />

Federated<br />

Data<br />

Archive<br />

Scenarios /<br />

Test Procedures<br />

Event Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Utilities<br />

Object Model<br />

Utilities<br />

Figure B.3. Notional Jo<strong>in</strong>t Mission Infrastructure<br />

B.2.2 JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENTS<br />

To effectively test a system <strong>in</strong> a jo<strong>in</strong>t context, the jo<strong>in</strong>t mission environments <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

system must be def<strong>in</strong>ed to the degree that the prerequisite associated warfight<strong>in</strong>g systems can be<br />

identified. In addition, operationally realistic, representative scenarios should also exist<br />

describ<strong>in</strong>g the CONOPS and JTTPs, as well as necessary <strong>in</strong>formation or services that must be<br />

exchanged to satisfy the <strong>in</strong>teroperability (for legacy systems) or publish/subscribe requirements<br />

(for net-centric systems). F<strong>in</strong>ally, test procedures, derived from the evaluation needs, will be<br />

produced to capture and def<strong>in</strong>e all the necessary systems and their configurations, the data<br />

collection po<strong>in</strong>ts and archiv<strong>in</strong>g strategy, the event timel<strong>in</strong>e, and any other necessary<br />

configuration <strong>in</strong>formation so that the test could be repeated by a different test team.<br />

B.2.3 CORE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPABILITY<br />

The objective core <strong>in</strong>frastructure will provide the capability essential to generate the jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

mission environment that is needed for T&E <strong>in</strong> all jo<strong>in</strong>t mission areas. The core <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

capabilities <strong>in</strong>clude a persistent data transport capability, common middleware, basic object<br />

B-4<br />

For Official Use Only<br />

Appendix B

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!