TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA
TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA
TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
C HAPTER 4<br />
4.9.5 Trade Study<br />
A complete description of the trade study can be found in Lay et al. (2005). The scoring process is based<br />
on the Kepner-Tregoe methodology. The idea is simple. The options are judged against a set of<br />
mandatory criteria (“musts”) and a set of discriminators (“wants”). Each must is scored as a pass/fail for<br />
each option, whereas the wants are weighted by importance and scored for each option on a scale of 1 to<br />
10. Failing a mandatory criterion disqualifies the option from consideration. The highest weighted sum of<br />
the discriminator scores determines the best option.<br />
The options in this case are the six architectures described in the Section 4.3. The list of mandatory<br />
criteria and discriminators was established through a lengthy process of iteration, based on initial inputs<br />
from a joint <strong>TPF</strong>/Darwin workshop and then edited in a series of meetings of the <strong>TPF</strong>-I Architecture and<br />
Table 4-3. Scores for Nulling Architectures Considered in Trade Study<br />
Linear DCB X-Array (2:1) Diamond DCB Z-Array Triangle Linear 3<br />
Overall score / 1000 816 860 789 749 779 795<br />
Performance 381 385 337 341 292 342<br />
Cost / risk 435 475 452 408 487 452<br />
Table 4-4. Key Discriminators in Trade Study, with Scoring Relative to Linear DCB Array<br />
Metric<br />
Linear DCB<br />
X-Array<br />
(2:1)<br />
Diamond<br />
DCB<br />
Z-Array Triangle Linear 3<br />
Performance<br />
Number of planet systems characterized by spectroscopy at<br />
high angular resolution, beyond minimum required<br />
Star count 0 0 -13 -4 -25 -19<br />
Fidelity of image reconstruction<br />
Redundancy / graceful degradation<br />
rms/peak (in Point Spread Function for<br />
planet at high res inner working angle)<br />
Expected % of stars observed after loss<br />
of 1 spacecraft<br />
0 -2 -6 -8 -14 -4<br />
0 4 -17 -6 -17 -17<br />
General astrophysics potential Dynamic range of baselines (max/min) 0 -4 -5 -10 -8 -4<br />
Cost and Risk<br />
Number of types of spacecraft # types 0 14 0 -9 0 0<br />
Mass margin Mass margin 0 0 3 3 15 6<br />
Beam transport optics complexity # hops to combiner 0 12 0 -10 0 0<br />
Beamcombiner optics complexity # parts (from schematic) 0 0 0 0 -10 -10<br />
Number of mechanisms/ moving parts # mechanisms / deployments 0 0 4 4 11 4<br />
Difficulty of integration and test # spacecraft 0 0 7 7 17 7<br />
Complexity of flight operations # spacecraft 0 0 4 4 10 4<br />
0 43 -27 -66 -33 -22<br />
90