28.01.2015 Views

TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

C HAPTER 2<br />

would be in atmospheres of different composition and for stars of different spectral type and incident<br />

ultraviolet flux. These uncertainties, however, could be addressed by further modeling studies.<br />

2.4.2 Resolution Needed<br />

This section provides quantitative information on the sensitivity necessary to detect spectral features on<br />

Earth or an Earth-like exoplanet. The equivalent width needed for optimal detection of each chemical<br />

signature in the thermal infrared is given in Figure 2-4 (Kaltenegger et al. 2007). Following standard<br />

practice, the total absorption in the feature is expressed in terms of equivalent width, (i.e., the spectral<br />

width of an equal area of a rectangular line with zero residual intensity and unity continuum). To detect a<br />

spectral feature with optimum signal to noise requires that the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of<br />

the spectrometer should be approximately equal to the FWHM of the spectral features. For an extrasolar<br />

planet this will not be known, but assuming an Earth-analog as a guideline, we can specify these numbers.<br />

We determine equivalent width for these species by integrating the difference between a model spectrum<br />

with and without the chemical of interest. The spectral resolution (λ/Δλ) needed for optimal detection of<br />

each changing spectral feature is given in Figure 2-4. Here λ is the central wavelength of a feature, and Δλ<br />

is the FWHM of the feature after it has been smeared sufficiently to blend any sharp lines yet still retain<br />

its essential overall shape. These numbers are relevant for the design of the <strong>TPF</strong>-I and Darwin mission.<br />

Note that features like N 2 O would have to be detected on top of another feature, implying an excellent<br />

signal-tonoise ratio (SNR) for detection. This example also illustrates that identification of the continuum<br />

region, as well as potentially overlapping species, is also an important part of biomarker detection, which<br />

in some cases may require higher spectral resolution, in addition to high signal to noise.<br />

2.4.3 Planets Around Different Stars<br />

The interferometric systems suggested for Darwin and the <strong>TPF</strong>-I mission operate in the mid-IR, and the<br />

coronagraph suggested for <strong>TPF</strong>-C operates in the visible. For the former it is thus the thermal emission<br />

emanating from the planet that is detected and analyzed, while for the latter the reflected stellar flux is<br />

measured. This means, that if you want to observe Earth-like planets in the Habitable Zone (HZ) around a<br />

given star, the thermal flux will to first order be constant for a given planetary size, while the reflected<br />

stellar flux will scale with the brightness of the star. The suppression of the primary’s thermal emission<br />

will, on the other hand, be progressively easier for later and later spectral types. The contrast ratio is a<br />

factor of about 4 more for FV stars, 30 less for KV stars, and about 300 less for MV stars compared to the<br />

Sun–Earth contrast ration in the IR (Kaltenegger, Eiroa et al. 2007). Surprisingly enough, it may thus be<br />

easier for the IR interferometer concept to detect a habitable Earth around an M-Dwarf than around<br />

something more akin to our own Sun. This is true for interferometric systems like Darwin and <strong>TPF</strong>-I that<br />

can be adapted to each individual target system, since the HZ moves closer and closer to the star for later<br />

and later stellar types. The baseline of the interferometers have to increase to resolve M-star planetarysystems<br />

at larger distances, a constraint that is taken into account for the M target systems at largest<br />

distance in the target star catalogue.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!