TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA
TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA
TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
C HAPTER 2<br />
would be in atmospheres of different composition and for stars of different spectral type and incident<br />
ultraviolet flux. These uncertainties, however, could be addressed by further modeling studies.<br />
2.4.2 Resolution Needed<br />
This section provides quantitative information on the sensitivity necessary to detect spectral features on<br />
Earth or an Earth-like exoplanet. The equivalent width needed for optimal detection of each chemical<br />
signature in the thermal infrared is given in Figure 2-4 (Kaltenegger et al. 2007). Following standard<br />
practice, the total absorption in the feature is expressed in terms of equivalent width, (i.e., the spectral<br />
width of an equal area of a rectangular line with zero residual intensity and unity continuum). To detect a<br />
spectral feature with optimum signal to noise requires that the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of<br />
the spectrometer should be approximately equal to the FWHM of the spectral features. For an extrasolar<br />
planet this will not be known, but assuming an Earth-analog as a guideline, we can specify these numbers.<br />
We determine equivalent width for these species by integrating the difference between a model spectrum<br />
with and without the chemical of interest. The spectral resolution (λ/Δλ) needed for optimal detection of<br />
each changing spectral feature is given in Figure 2-4. Here λ is the central wavelength of a feature, and Δλ<br />
is the FWHM of the feature after it has been smeared sufficiently to blend any sharp lines yet still retain<br />
its essential overall shape. These numbers are relevant for the design of the <strong>TPF</strong>-I and Darwin mission.<br />
Note that features like N 2 O would have to be detected on top of another feature, implying an excellent<br />
signal-tonoise ratio (SNR) for detection. This example also illustrates that identification of the continuum<br />
region, as well as potentially overlapping species, is also an important part of biomarker detection, which<br />
in some cases may require higher spectral resolution, in addition to high signal to noise.<br />
2.4.3 Planets Around Different Stars<br />
The interferometric systems suggested for Darwin and the <strong>TPF</strong>-I mission operate in the mid-IR, and the<br />
coronagraph suggested for <strong>TPF</strong>-C operates in the visible. For the former it is thus the thermal emission<br />
emanating from the planet that is detected and analyzed, while for the latter the reflected stellar flux is<br />
measured. This means, that if you want to observe Earth-like planets in the Habitable Zone (HZ) around a<br />
given star, the thermal flux will to first order be constant for a given planetary size, while the reflected<br />
stellar flux will scale with the brightness of the star. The suppression of the primary’s thermal emission<br />
will, on the other hand, be progressively easier for later and later spectral types. The contrast ratio is a<br />
factor of about 4 more for FV stars, 30 less for KV stars, and about 300 less for MV stars compared to the<br />
Sun–Earth contrast ration in the IR (Kaltenegger, Eiroa et al. 2007). Surprisingly enough, it may thus be<br />
easier for the IR interferometer concept to detect a habitable Earth around an M-Dwarf than around<br />
something more akin to our own Sun. This is true for interferometric systems like Darwin and <strong>TPF</strong>-I that<br />
can be adapted to each individual target system, since the HZ moves closer and closer to the star for later<br />
and later stellar types. The baseline of the interferometers have to increase to resolve M-star planetarysystems<br />
at larger distances, a constraint that is taken into account for the M target systems at largest<br />
distance in the target star catalogue.<br />
20