TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A PPENDIX F Alice Quillen, University of Rochester Stephen Serjeant, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK C. P. de Vries, Space Research Organization Netherlands Rachel Webster, Michelson Science Center Design and Architecture Trade Studies Oliver P. Lay, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Stefan Martin, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Benjamin Lane, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Kenneth Marsh, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Charley Noecker, Ball Aerospace Eugene Serabyn, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Velu Velusamy, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Brent Ware, Jet Propulsion Laboratory TPF-I Flight Baseline Design Stefan Martin, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Oliver P. Lay, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Sarah Hunyadi, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Technology Roadmap for TPF-I (Nulling Interferometry) Peter R. Lawson, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Robert Gappinger, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Alexander Ksendzov, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Oliver P. Lay, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Stefan Martin, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Robert Peters, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Technology Roadmap for TPF-I (Formation Flying) Asif Ahmed, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Matt Wette, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Dan Scharf, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Behcet Acikmese, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Eddie Benowitz , Jet Propulsion Laboratory Chuck Bergh, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Allan Eisenman, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Jason Keim, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Arin Morfopolous, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Joel Shields, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Guru Singh, Jet Propulsion Laboratory 196
C ONTRIBUTORS AND C REDITS Technology Roadmap for TPF-I (Future Developments) William C. Danchi, Goddard Space Flight Center Peter R. Lawson, Jet Propulsion Laboratory David Leisowitz, Goddard Space Flight Center John Monnier, University of Michigan Stephen C. Unwin, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Discussion and Conclusion Charles Beichman, California Institute of Technology Kenneth J. Johnston, U.S. Naval Observatory Copyright Permissions Figure 2-1 – Figure by W. A. Traub and K. W. Jucks. Reprinted, by permission of the American Geophysical Union, from Atmospheres in the Solar System: Comparative Aeronomy (2002). Figure 2-2 – Figure by L. Kaltenegger et al. Reprinted, by permission of the American Astronomical Society, from Astrophysical Journal (2007), in press. Figure 2-3 – Figure by Giovanna Tinetti (Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris) for this publication. Figure 2-4 – Figure by L. Kaltenegger et al. Reprinted, by permission of the American Astronomical Society, from Astrophysical Journal (2007), in press. Figure 2-5 – Figure by A. Segura et al. Reprinted, by permission of the publisher, from Astrobiology 3, 689–708 (2003). Figure 2-6 – Figure by L. Kaltenegger et al. Reprinted, by permission of the American Astronomical Society, from Astrophysical Journal (2007), in press. Figure 2-8 – Figure by C. A. Beichman et al. Reprinted, by permission of the American Astronomical Society, from Astrophysical Journal 652, 1674–1693 (2006). Figure 2-10 – Figure by C. A. Beichman et al. Reprinted, by permission of the American Astronomical Society, from Astrophysical Journal 639, 1166–1176 (2006). Figure 2-11 – Figure by G. Bryden et al. Reprinted, by permission of the American Astronomical Society, from Astrophysical Journal 636, 1098–1113 (2006). Figure 2-12. – Figure by M. C. Wyatt et al. Reprinted, by permission of the American Astronomical Society, from Astrophysical Journal (2007), in press. 197
Page 1 and 2:
JPL Publication 07-1 Terrestrial Pl
Page 3:
Abstract Over the past two years, t
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgements Twenty-two represe
Page 9 and 10:
Table of Contents 1 Introduction...
Page 11 and 12:
4.8.3 Post-Nulling Calibration.....
Page 13 and 14:
6.4.5 Double Fourier Interferometry
Page 15 and 16:
I NTRODUCTION 1 Introduction Over 2
Page 17 and 18:
I NTRODUCTION et al. 2004), and res
Page 19 and 20:
I NTRODUCTION Standard Interferomet
Page 21:
I NTRODUCTION 1.4 References Angel,
Page 24 and 25:
C HAPTER 2 0.7 to 1.5 AU scaled by
Page 26 and 27:
C HAPTER 2 Table 2-2. Illustrative
Page 28 and 29:
C HAPTER 2 Classical interferometry
Page 30 and 31:
C HAPTER 2 trivial in the absence o
Page 32 and 33:
C HAPTER 2 Figure 2-3. Simulated mi
Page 34 and 35:
C HAPTER 2 would be in atmospheres
Page 36 and 37:
C HAPTER 2 Figure 2-6. The mid-infr
Page 38 and 39:
C HAPTER 2 Lines of constant stella
Page 40 and 41:
C HAPTER 2 presence of zodiacal clo
Page 42 and 43:
C HAPTER 2 S EZ 2π ∫ θ max ∫
Page 44 and 45:
C HAPTER 2 Figure 2-11. Observation
Page 46 and 47:
C HAPTER 2 Figure 2-12. Models of t
Page 48 and 49:
C HAPTER 2 Beichman, C. A., Fridlun
Page 50 and 51:
C HAPTER 2 2.7.4 Suitable Targets E
Page 52 and 53:
C HAPTER 2 Reach, W. T., Franz, B.
Page 54 and 55:
C HAPTER 3 3.1.1 Darwin/TPF-I Prope
Page 56 and 57:
C HAPTER 3 clouds or an OB associat
Page 58 and 59:
C HAPTER 3 Figure 3-3. Three possib
Page 60 and 61:
C HAPTER 3 the circumstellar disk,
Page 62 and 63:
C HAPTER 3 Figure 3-6. (Left panel)
Page 64 and 65:
C HAPTER 3 Continuum interferometry
Page 66 and 67:
C HAPTER 3 Figure 3-9: Simulated im
Page 68 and 69:
C HAPTER 3 3.3 Conclusions Darwin/T
Page 70 and 71:
C HAPTER 3 Nguyen, H. T., Kallivaya
Page 73 and 74:
D ESIGN AND A R C H I T E C T U R E
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111:
Page 114 and 115:
C HAPTER 5 Heavy launch vehicle. Th
Page 116 and 117:
C HAPTER 5 5.3.2 Combiner Spacecraf
Page 118 and 119:
C HAPTER 5 5.3.5 Beam Transfer betw
Page 120 and 121:
C HAPTER 5 Figure 5-8. Control sche
Page 122 and 123:
C HAPTER 5 Figure 5-9. First sectio
Page 124 and 125:
C HAPTER 5 Figure 5-9 shows the fir
Page 126 and 127:
C HAPTER 5 5.4.4 Shear Metrology Sh
Page 128 and 129:
C HAPTER 5 Figure 5-15. TPF-I Fligh
Page 130 and 131:
C HAPTER 5 secondary mirror along t
Page 132 and 133:
C HAPTER 5 a) c) b) d) IWA = 43 mas
Page 134 and 135:
C HAPTER 5 planets found. Figure 5-
Page 136 and 137:
C HAPTER 5 30 25 5 M earth 3 M eart
Page 138 and 139:
C HAPTER 5 5.8.4 Angular Resolution
Page 140 and 141:
C HAPTER 5 Table 5-3. Angular Resol
Page 142 and 143:
C HAPTER 5 The optimization works b
Page 145 and 146:
T E C H N O L O G Y R OADMAP FOR TP
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160: T E C H N O L O G Y R OADMAP FOR TP
Page 173 and 174: F UTURE D EVELOPMENTS 7 Preparatory
Page 175 and 176: F UTURE D EVELOPMENTS • To comple
Page 177 and 178: F UTURE D EVELOPMENTS Table 7-1. Pr
Page 179 and 180: D ISCUSSION AND C ONCLUSION 8 Discu
Page 181 and 182: Appendices 167
Page 183 and 184: T E C H N O L O G Y A DVISORY C O M
Page 185 and 186: F L I G H T S YSTEM C ONFIGURATION
Page 187: F L I G H T S YSTEM C ONFIGURATION
Page 190 and 191: A PPENDIX C 2. Identical FACS fligh
Page 192 and 193: A PPENDIX C 2. Recall that the coef
Page 194 and 195: A PPENDIX C Once the formation has
Page 196 and 197: A PPENDIX C Figure C-3. Example of
Page 198 and 199: A PPENDIX C Figure C-4. FAST Flight
Page 200 and 201: A PPENDIX C The “true” time of
Page 202 and 203: A PPENDIX C References Cohen, S., a
Page 204 and 205: A PPENDIX D DC DCB DM DM DOCS DOD D
Page 206 and 207: A PPENDIX D NaCl NAR NASA NASTRAN N
Page 208 and 209: A PPENDIX E Appendix E TPF-I Review
Page 212: A PPENDIX F Figure 3-1 - Original f
show all

TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?