28.01.2015 Views

TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

C HAPTER 6<br />

that would expand the general astrophysics capability of the current baseline design. Although such<br />

hardware is not currently funded for development within the <strong>TPF</strong>-I project, its importance has been<br />

emphasized by the <strong>TPF</strong>-I <strong>SWG</strong> for funding in future years.<br />

6.4.1 Off-Axis Phase Referencing<br />

The most critical hardware requirement for maximizing general astrophysics will be the addition of phase<br />

referencing using an off-axis guide star, a capability not needed for the planet finding activity where the<br />

primary star acts as the phase reference. This capability is crucial to obtain the theoretical sensitivity limit<br />

that is needed for very faint objects, since current baseline designs require an external reference for<br />

monitoring OPD drifts internal to the spacecraft and perhaps for monitoring array geometry.<br />

Having the capability of using an off-axis star, and hence an additional beam transport system, for phase<br />

referencing may not pose a problem if it is incorporated into the design process from the beginning, but it<br />

surely will require substantial modifications to the optics at the collector telescopes. <strong>TPF</strong>-I is a system<br />

optimized for low thermal background and off-axis phase referencing may require non-trivial changes to<br />

the current design of a “dual-star” module that is used to select the off-axis reference star while passing<br />

the on-axis light directly as is done with VLTI/PRIMA (Quirrenbach et al. 2004) and the Palomar Testbed<br />

Interferometer (PTI) (Colavita et al. 1999). Another possible approach would be to include a “fast<br />

switching” capability to the feed system or secondary mirrors on the collectors, to alternate between a<br />

guide star and the target star as is currently done in ground-based radio and mm-wave interferometry. A<br />

final option would be use an efficient dichroic to select a star in the field as a phase reference while<br />

allowing the mid-IR beam train to contain a different target. Further study is necessary to develop<br />

optimal designs for off-axis guiding that are consistent with the nulling requirements.<br />

6.4.2 Wavelength Coverage<br />

We must also consider the broadest possible spectral coverage when optimizing scientific return for<br />

general astrophysics. Based on the science case for terrestrial planet finding, the short wavelength side of<br />

<strong>TPF</strong>-I is generally restricted to ~5 μm due to: a) planets in the habitable zone have temperatures near<br />

room temperature, giving a peak in blackbody emission near 10 μm, and hence limited emission at short<br />

wavelengths; b) the performance requirements for the optics and wavefront quality that are driven for<br />

maximum performance around 10 μm to provide sufficient starlight suppression (deep nulling) to detect<br />

planets in the habitable zone.<br />

Because these limitations are not relevant for general astrophysical observations, the final <strong>TPF</strong>-I design<br />

should consider incorporating a secondary beam combiner optimized for general astrophysics. While this<br />

could add significant cost and complexity to the system, one option might be to design the phasereferencing<br />

combiner for this purpose. This idea is further explained below.<br />

It is likely that a ‘fringe tracking’ system will be incorporated into any baseline <strong>TPF</strong>-I design to control<br />

internal and external optical path difference (OPD) drifts. Most such designs operate by using off-band<br />

(near-infrared) light from the target itself (i.e., an “on-axis” guide star). In principle, this subsystem could<br />

be designed with its own separate beamcombiner that might function for example in the 1–5 μm band, to<br />

be used in parallel with the 5–15 μm beam combiner that is optimized for nulling and other lower-spatialresolution<br />

astrophysics.<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!