28.01.2015 Views

TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

TPF-I SWG Report - Exoplanet Exploration Program - NASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C HAPTER 4<br />

15<br />

10<br />

Response<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

θ x / μrad<br />

0 ± π/2 ± π ± 3π/2<br />

0.40<br />

1 2 3 4<br />

Beamtrain<br />

optics<br />

Planet photon rate / s -1<br />

0.30<br />

0.20<br />

0.10<br />

0.00<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

-0.10<br />

-0.20<br />

Single-mode<br />

spatial filter<br />

-0.30<br />

-0.40<br />

Array rotation angle / radians<br />

Figure 4-3. Chopped dual Bracewell configuration. Lower left – schematic of interferometer;<br />

upper left – section through response on the sky; upper right – response on sky showing star at<br />

central null and planet offset. The planet follows the red locus as the array is rotated about the<br />

line of sight to the star; the corresponding photon rate vs. rotation angle is shown at lower right.<br />

The lower right panel of Figure 4-3 shows the variation of the chopped planet photon rate with the<br />

rotation angle of the array. This characteristic signature depends on the location of the planet relative to<br />

the star. As we change the ‘azimuthal’ offset of the planet, the signature pattern is shifted left or right with<br />

respect to the array rotation angle. Increasing the radial offset of the planet from the star means that the<br />

circular locus in the upper right panel of Figure 4-3 expands and passes through more peaks and valleys<br />

of the response, resulting in a signature pattern with higher ‘frequency’. In general, the data must be<br />

inverted to obtain the fluxes and locations of any planets that are present.<br />

The approach that has been used most commonly to do this is correlation mapping, first suggested by<br />

Angel and Woolf (1997). The principle is described in Figure 4-4. The process is closely analogous to the<br />

Fourier transform used for standard interferometric image synthesis. The cross-correlation process<br />

generates a “dirty map” (a term borrowed from radio synthesis imaging), which must be deconvolved to<br />

extract the point-like planets. The example in Figure 4-4 shows the noise-free dirty map for a single point<br />

source, and therefore represents the point-spread function (PSF) for the array. Because we are dealing<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!