Skáholt 2002 - Nabo

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Results The survey produced a 3D model of the survey area, and the placement of the excavation area and features into this. The survey showed several areas of earthworks that were identified during the ground truthing. The farm mound, hollow-ways, and a ridge running east to west with discrete features on it (Figures 1 & 2). STN2 STN3 Kirkja Kyndluhóll Trench [152] STN1 Area of excavation [161] 0 m 50 m 100 m Figure 2. Contour Plan of the homefield showing the location of the excavations On the basis of the <strong>2002</strong> GPS contour survey it is proposed that a survey is carried out in the area of the 2003 excavation, before trenching using the 4600LS GPS. A more detailed survey should be carried out over areas of the survey, to be decided on the basis of funding and excavation requirements. It is suggested that the farm mound and the ridge, including the area of hollow-ways immediately south-east of this is conducted in 2003. It 9
is also suggested that a topographic survey, i.e. of the landscape features such as fences, buildings, car park areas is carried out using either, or both, the GPS and (or) the Total Station, so as to create a base map for the excavation and to orthorectify aerial photographs from different periods to understand the changes that have occurred at Skálholt. The results of the survey identified the significance and use of contour survey in relation to excavation. In several ways the results can be used to: 1. provide a context for excavation results to sit within its wider environs; 2. graphically support excavation results through 3D models and placement of CAD drawings; 3. identify areas for future, more detailed targeted survey 4. identify locations for potential excavation based on the survival of upstanding earthworks, both obvious to eye and those more subtle. GJÓSKULAGARANNSÓKN (TEPHRA ANALYSIS) Magnús Á. Sigurgeirsson, Fjallalind 123, IS-201 Kópavogur, netf.: masig@mmedia.is Fyrri rannsóknir Í skýrslunni er greint frá niðurstöðum gjóskulagaathugana sumarið <strong>2002</strong>, gerðar í tengslum við fornleifarannsóknir í Skálholti. Farnar voru tvær dagsferðir að Skálholti, dagana 7. júní og 13. júlí. Fyrri daginn var athyglinni einkum beint að uppgraftarsvæðinu og umhverfi þess en seinni daginn voru gjóskulög könnuð í nágrenni Skálholtsstaðar. Við greiningu gjóskulaganna var stuðst við fyrri rannsóknir í Skálholti og nágrenni. Gjóskulög voru könnuð í tengslum við fornleifarannsóknir í Skálholti á árunum 1954- 1958 (Kristján Eldjárn o.fl. 1988). Fram kemur að Sigurður Þórarinsson hafi gert nokkra 10
Page 1 and 2: SKÁLHOLT 2002 Framvinduskýrslur/I
Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .
Page 5 and 6: LIST OF PLATES Plate I. View of the
Page 7 and 8: Between 1954 and 1958, the first pr
Page 9 and 10: structures. Thereafter, excavation
Page 11 and 12: The project is a cooperation betwee
Page 13: 76 m 75 m 74 m 73 m 72 m 71 m 70 m
Page 17 and 18: I I I I I I I V c m S k á l h o l
Page 19 and 20: Þrátt fyrir að gjóskulög frá
Page 21 and 22: productivity. Soil accumulation on
Page 23 and 24: EXCAVATION Excavation occurred at t
Page 25 and 26: The buildings basically consisted o
Page 27 and 28: Room [15] (Bishop´s Inner Chambers
Page 29 and 30: Abandonment of the building is mark
Page 31 and 32: Room [127] (Unknown Annexe; MS) Unm
Page 33 and 34: sporadically used to dump hearth wa
Page 35 and 36: Rector´s chambers, and after 1781,
Page 37 and 38: earthquake and re-location of the s
Page 39 and 40: There is little doubt this feature
Page 41 and 42: much earlier. Curiously though, the
Page 43 and 44: Figure 6. Phasing of School Rooms 8
Page 45 and 46: On the southern side of the haybarn
Page 47 and 48: shelters in the 19 th century seems
Page 49 and 50: 3. FINDS The amount of finds recove
Page 51 and 52: CERAMIC Pottery A rapid assessment
Page 53 and 54: glazed earthenwares (faience) were
Page 55 and 56: Bearing in mind that the rooms on t
Page 57 and 58: with incomplete markings: Ger[many]
Page 59 and 60: lown as in the 18 th century exampl
Page 61 and 62: lines. There was also a fine exampl
Page 63 and 64: Other A few rarer metal types were
Page 65 and 66:
() which has a flaw running almost
Page 67 and 68:
comes fairly close and is a rare si
Page 69 and 70:
4. DISCUSSION THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL PO
Page 71 and 72:
communities may have introduced new
Page 73 and 74:
practices, a general hypothesis tha
Page 75 and 76:
5. APPENDICES UNITS No NoType Group
Page 77 and 78:
No NoType GroupNo Description 82 De
Page 79 and 80:
No NoType GroupNo Description 203 D
Page 81 and 82:
FINDS FindsNo UnitNo BoxNo Object M
Page 83 and 84:
FindsNo UnitNo BoxNo Object Materia
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
6. REFERENCES Adderley, W.P., Simps
Page 107 and 108:
Horsley, T., (1999). ‘A prelimina
show all

Skáholt 2002 - Nabo

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?