Skáholt 2002 - Nabo
Skáholt 2002 - Nabo
Skáholt 2002 - Nabo
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4. DISCUSSION<br />
THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL<br />
There are two aspects to the archaeology of Skálholt which really stand out in terms of<br />
the potential for analysis: one is the survival of the architectural fabric and the other is the<br />
rich material culture assemblages. They suggest three key avenues of enquiry in the study<br />
of the settlement, all potentially supplemented by documentary sources:<br />
Living Conditions and Lifestyles<br />
At the most basic level, the archaeological remains can inform on varied living conditions<br />
within the community during the 18 th century – particularly how different sections of the<br />
community lived, and what differential access and usage they had to material culture.<br />
Such a study will require much more detailed analysis of the finds and a more careful<br />
consideration of context, specifically issues of re-deposition or disturbance. It should also<br />
include other sites as comparison, especially local farms at one end, and other elite<br />
residences at the other (e.g. Bessastaðir, Hólar, Viðey).<br />
Organization of Space<br />
More generally, the layout of the buildings on the site provides the opportunity to<br />
examine spatial organization and how this affected people’s movement and perception of<br />
space. More accurately than studying surviving plans and maps , the archaeological<br />
remains can help us to understand how movement was directed and access between<br />
rooms and spaces was controlled and how different sections of the community may have<br />
perceived the site in different ways. Such an approach can also consider the unique nature<br />
of the site in Iceland at this time in terms of the large population residing there, and to<br />
64