30.01.2015 Views

CW2001 Program - Computers and Writing

CW2001 Program - Computers and Writing

CW2001 Program - Computers and Writing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Friday<br />

2:15 — 3:30 Session C.9<br />

Inhabiting Cyberspace:<br />

Synchronous Conferences <strong>and</strong> Metaconversing<br />

BC 129<br />

Joan Latchaw, moderator<br />

Kristina DeVoe <strong>and</strong> Chris Rausch<br />

“<strong>Writing</strong> Ourselves Online”:<br />

Negotiating Roles in the Electronic <strong>Writing</strong> Classroom<br />

The presenters closely examine their own multiple, unexpected, <strong>and</strong>,<br />

sometimes, clashing roles that emerged from observing <strong>and</strong>, later,<br />

mentoring students during a first-year composition class taught on<br />

the MOO in the Fall of 2000. By incorporating transcripts of the class<br />

discussion into the presentation, the presenters analyze <strong>and</strong> show how<br />

they approached group dynamics, community, <strong>and</strong> conflict resolution<br />

through the use of language strategies <strong>and</strong> language channels–<br />

especially in the context of emotes, directed speech, backchannel<br />

(paging <strong>and</strong> whispering), <strong>and</strong> their own physicality. Finally, they<br />

provide corresponding metaphors for novice instructors who are trying<br />

to negotiate their own roles within an online classroom environment.<br />

Trish Harris<br />

Synchronous Metaconversing:<br />

Active Social Construction of Knowledge<br />

This participatory session provides an experience quite unlike what we<br />

experience in our usual scholarly <strong>and</strong> classroom conversations, in which<br />

we tend to self-edit <strong>and</strong> compress. Out of consideration for others’ time,<br />

out of natural reserve, out of fear of being discovered “incorrect,” we<br />

tend to edit first thoughts, we mistake a text’s, or a conversation’s,<br />

surface for its depth-charge relevance. But if offered the freedom to<br />

risk being “right,” how do we react Do we appropriate Do we affront<br />

Do we oppose How do we engage the true subjects in our virtual<br />

discourse communities This active session attempts to socially<br />

construct answers to these questions <strong>and</strong> model ways our different<br />

languages can be explored in the writing classroom.<br />

50 <strong>Computers</strong> & <strong>Writing</strong> 2001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!