20.02.2015 Views

The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance ...

The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance ...

The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 7: Sources of funding after September 2004<br />

1,000<br />

Count<br />

500<br />

0<br />

Other<br />

Science<br />

Maths<br />

English<br />

LC/SWE<br />

Other<br />

Science<br />

English<br />

Other funder<br />

Can Overall IWB Provision be explained by School Type?<br />

It might be assumed that certain types of schools are more likely to have greater<br />

IWB provision – as measured by how small the pupil/IWB intensity ratio is 5 . For<br />

example, schools with a technology specialism might be expected to have used part<br />

of their capital grant for specialist designation to purchase IWBs. However, Figure<br />

shows there is surprisingly little difference in IWB provision between specialist types:<br />

the only group with notably better IWB provision is the Science specialist schools.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact that technology schools IWB provision is almost identical to that at nonspecialist<br />

schools could be explained by the fact that they mostly received specialist<br />

status (<strong>and</strong> hence initial capital grant) at a time when IWBs were new <strong>and</strong> very<br />

expensive; 18 of 24 technology schools in the survey received their specialist status<br />

prior to 2002.<br />

5 For this section 10 schools with an intensity ratio of over 300 are excluded since they are extreme outliers.<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!