20.02.2015 Views

The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance ...

The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance ...

The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 18 investigates training in pedagogy <strong>and</strong> planning in more detail. Many<br />

teachers do report that they are ‘self taught’ in the more pedagogical aspects of the<br />

IWB. This could imply that many teachers do not feel they need specific training in<br />

these areas. However, this leaves open how many of these teachers may have<br />

actually adapted their pedagogical teaching style since the introduction of IWBs. By<br />

contrast, around a third of teachers are reporting that they have had no training in<br />

pedagogical aspects of the IWB. It is these teachers who may need additional<br />

support in learning how to use the IWB to enhance their teaching.<br />

Figure 18: IWB training for pedagogy <strong>and</strong> planning<br />

Supporting a mixed learning style with IWBs<br />

Reinforcing learning with IWBs<br />

Formally trained<br />

Informally trained<br />

Self taught<br />

None<br />

Enhancing pupil motivation with IWBs<br />

Encouraging an interactive teaching style<br />

Re-cap on previous lessons by saving <strong>and</strong> archiving notes<br />

Creating lesson sequences <strong>and</strong> diagrams<br />

Making a school-based resource bank<br />

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%<br />

Figure 19 emphasises the extent to which most teachers prefer informal training in<br />

IWBs. This includes self-teaching methods such as trial <strong>and</strong> error <strong>and</strong> asking<br />

colleagues for help with specific tasks. Three-quarter of teachers also report that<br />

they find departmental training in IWBs to be useful. This departmental training can<br />

be directed to very specific goals or areas of the curriculum with a body of teachers<br />

agreeing where an IWB resource should be integrated into specific areas of the<br />

department scheme of work. It is also possible that departmental training may be<br />

more likely to demonstrate uses of the IWB that do not disrupt existing schemes of<br />

work <strong>and</strong> the pedagogical approaches that are implicit in them.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se responses do reveal some of the inherent tensions involved in using formal<br />

training as the main means of disseminating good practice with IWBs. Teachers’<br />

clear preference is for training on a ‘need to know’ basis which can accommodate to<br />

their existing working patterns. Whilst formal training has the potential to<br />

demonstrate uses for the IWB that require a more radical departure from existing<br />

teaching, teachers may see it as disruptive, less useful <strong>and</strong> requiring a significant<br />

139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!