20.02.2015 Views

The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance ...

The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance ...

The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Many of the newer teachers do not agree with the statement, but it is most likely that<br />

this is because many of these teachers have used IWBs during their entire teaching<br />

careers.<br />

Figure 22: Agreement with the statement ‘interactive whiteboards have changed how I teach’<br />

30<br />

25<br />

Agree<br />

Neutral<br />

Disagree<br />

20<br />

Number of teachers<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

3 years or less 4 to 10 years 11 years or more<br />

Teaching experience<br />

Overall, teachers do agree that children are motivated by IWBs. New teachers are<br />

less likely to agree with this statement (see figure 23), perhaps because they have<br />

less basis for comparison, or because the technology itself is less significant in their<br />

reflections on their practice.<br />

Figure 23: Agreement with the statement ‘children are motivated by IWBs’<br />

25<br />

20<br />

Agree<br />

Neutral<br />

Disagree<br />

Number of teachers<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

3 years or less 4 to 10 years 11 years or more<br />

Teaching experience<br />

Figure 24 shows that almost all teachers agree that building up a bank of IWB<br />

resources to share with colleagues will save time in the long run, despite the fact that<br />

previous charts suggest few teachers currently use a centrally stored bank of<br />

resources or have had training in how to develop one.<br />

142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!