20.02.2015 Views

The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance ...

The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance ...

The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 8: Allocation of LC funding to departments<br />

Total<br />

departments<br />

receiving IWBs<br />

Department<br />

received all LC<br />

funding<br />

Funding shared<br />

with other<br />

departments<br />

Maths 103 40 63<br />

Science 100 41 59<br />

English 74 22 52<br />

Other subjects 18 7 11<br />

Figure 11: Combinations of departments receiving the LC funding<br />

Maths only 40<br />

Science only<br />

41<br />

English only<br />

22<br />

Other department<br />

7<br />

Maths <strong>and</strong> science<br />

19<br />

Maths <strong>and</strong> English<br />

11<br />

Science <strong>and</strong> English<br />

4<br />

Other combinations<br />

32<br />

Why was this department chosen to receive LC funding?<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was no consistent pattern in the reason for choosing which department<br />

received the LC funding for new IWBs. <strong>The</strong> most common reason selected (of the<br />

six options given) was that the curriculum in that subject area was deemed most<br />

likely to benefit from the use of interactive whiteboards (27%). 16% of schools used<br />

the funding to fully equip an already partially equipped department; 15% of<br />

heads/head of ICT thought staff in that department would make best use of the<br />

IWBs; 16% wanted to enhance an already successful department (see Figure 12).<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!