- Page 1 and 2: RESEARCH The Interactive Whiteboard
- Page 6 and 7: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AIMS AND METHODS
- Page 8 and 9: substantially enhance the use of IW
- Page 10 and 11: Observations for this project sugge
- Page 12 and 13: 1. THE STRUCTURE OF THIS REPORT Thi
- Page 14 and 15: 2003). Whilst many of the factors t
- Page 16 and 17: A range of data was collected in ea
- Page 18 and 19: 3.2.4 Pupil Focus Groups Focus grou
- Page 20 and 21: 3.5 Statistical Analysis of Pupil A
- Page 22 and 23: • Reasons given for the choice of
- Page 24 and 25: 5. FINDINGS: THE IMPACT OF THE INTR
- Page 26 and 27: colleagues or using commercial soft
- Page 28 and 29: textbooks or worksheets. This is tr
- Page 30 and 31: 5.3 How the Available Resources Sha
- Page 32 and 33: Illustrative Case Study. Example: T
- Page 34 and 35: Illustrative Case Study. Example: U
- Page 36 and 37: Illustrative Case Study. Example A
- Page 38 and 39: Illustrative Case study. Example B
- Page 40 and 41: Illustrative Case Study. Example C
- Page 42 and 43: • Familiarise themselves with the
- Page 44 and 45: were aware of this dimension and ha
- Page 46 and 47: is not good, if the students aren
- Page 48 and 49: 5.9.2 Teachers’ use of Multi-Medi
- Page 50 and 51: Figure 8: Frequency of using IWB by
- Page 52 and 53: Science classroom that map onto exi
- Page 54 and 55:
long run. Few teachers however curr
- Page 56 and 57:
On the negative side, a sizable min
- Page 58 and 59:
These kinds of difficulties can be
- Page 60 and 61:
change in their own setting. Others
- Page 62 and 63:
a number of schools is for us a sec
- Page 64 and 65:
Table 1: Key School-Level Statistic
- Page 66 and 67:
8.1.2. Difference-in-Differences (S
- Page 68 and 69:
Table 5 sets out the same type of r
- Page 70 and 71:
unlikely that right-hand censoring
- Page 72 and 73:
8.1.4 Difference-in-Differences (Be
- Page 74 and 75:
8.1.5 Discussion Overall, this stat
- Page 76 and 77:
figure; the mean percentages of pup
- Page 78 and 79:
Conclusion The larger scale survey
- Page 80 and 81:
Smith, H.J., Higgins, S., Wall, K.,
- Page 82 and 83:
schools. These were combined with p
- Page 84 and 85:
elevant hard and software and the r
- Page 86 and 87:
Within government generally, where
- Page 88 and 89:
Yet if there is little doubt in pol
- Page 90 and 91:
overhead projector (OHPs) (Though,
- Page 92 and 93:
intention to equip all children wit
- Page 94 and 95:
technology in much the same terms (
- Page 96 and 97:
In some lessons with IWBs these tec
- Page 98 and 99:
use shows considerable variation in
- Page 100 and 101:
Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2001) "Run
- Page 102 and 103:
Annex C Analysis of the IWB Baselin
- Page 104 and 105:
Table 7: Number of IWBs by Departme
- Page 106 and 107:
Figure 3: Funding source by subject
- Page 108 and 109:
Figure 7: Sources of funding after
- Page 110 and 111:
Are perceptions of ICT consistent w
- Page 112 and 113:
Table 8: Allocation of LC funding t
- Page 114 and 115:
Can perceptions of ICT resources in
- Page 116 and 117:
Figure 16: Number of IWBs in Maths
- Page 118 and 119:
schools have done this) and 100 mea
- Page 120 and 121:
Use of IWBs in Science Departments
- Page 122 and 123:
department feels all six areas are
- Page 124 and 125:
Use of IWBs in English Departments
- Page 126 and 127:
The training needs of English depar
- Page 128 and 129:
Annex D Analysis of the IWB Teacher
- Page 130 and 131:
Figure 3: Type of interactive white
- Page 132 and 133:
Reported Frequency of IWB Use by Te
- Page 134 and 135:
Figure 8: Frequency of using IWB by
- Page 136 and 137:
How are Teachers using their IWB? A
- Page 138 and 139:
Figure 14: Ease of finding suitable
- Page 140 and 141:
What type of IWB training have teac
- Page 142 and 143:
investment of time to integrate int
- Page 144 and 145:
Many of the newer teachers do not a
- Page 146 and 147:
Figure 25: Statements which the hig
- Page 148 and 149:
eport IWBs are used hardly ever or
- Page 150 and 151:
Table 2: Positive Statements: Perce
- Page 152 and 153:
2. 3.3 Response to technology. Tabl
- Page 154 and 155:
Annex F: Survey Instruments 1. The
- Page 156 and 157:
PERFORMANCE: AN EVALUATION Baseline
- Page 158 and 159:
Room Subject Source of funding Date
- Page 160 and 161:
INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARDS, PEDAGOGY A
- Page 162 and 163:
2. The pupil survey INTERACTIVE WHI
- Page 164:
Copies of this publication can be o