- Page 1 and 2:
RESEARCH The Interactive Whiteboard
- Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ……
- Page 6 and 7:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AIMS AND METHODS
- Page 8 and 9:
substantially enhance the use of IW
- Page 10 and 11:
Observations for this project sugge
- Page 12 and 13:
1. THE STRUCTURE OF THIS REPORT Thi
- Page 14 and 15:
2003). Whilst many of the factors t
- Page 16 and 17:
A range of data was collected in ea
- Page 18 and 19:
3.2.4 Pupil Focus Groups Focus grou
- Page 20 and 21:
3.5 Statistical Analysis of Pupil A
- Page 22 and 23:
• Reasons given for the choice of
- Page 24 and 25:
5. FINDINGS: THE IMPACT OF THE INTR
- Page 26 and 27:
colleagues or using commercial soft
- Page 28 and 29:
textbooks or worksheets. This is tr
- Page 30 and 31:
5.3 How the Available Resources Sha
- Page 32 and 33:
Illustrative Case Study. Example: T
- Page 34 and 35:
Illustrative Case Study. Example: U
- Page 36 and 37:
Illustrative Case Study. Example A
- Page 38 and 39:
Illustrative Case study. Example B
- Page 40 and 41:
Illustrative Case Study. Example C
- Page 42 and 43:
• Familiarise themselves with the
- Page 44 and 45:
were aware of this dimension and ha
- Page 46 and 47:
is not good, if the students aren
- Page 48 and 49:
5.9.2 Teachers’ use of Multi-Medi
- Page 50 and 51:
Figure 8: Frequency of using IWB by
- Page 52 and 53:
Science classroom that map onto exi
- Page 54 and 55:
long run. Few teachers however curr
- Page 56 and 57:
On the negative side, a sizable min
- Page 58 and 59:
These kinds of difficulties can be
- Page 60 and 61:
change in their own setting. Others
- Page 62 and 63:
a number of schools is for us a sec
- Page 64 and 65:
Table 1: Key School-Level Statistic
- Page 66 and 67:
8.1.2. Difference-in-Differences (S
- Page 68 and 69:
Table 5 sets out the same type of r
- Page 70 and 71:
unlikely that right-hand censoring
- Page 72 and 73:
8.1.4 Difference-in-Differences (Be
- Page 74 and 75:
8.1.5 Discussion Overall, this stat
- Page 76 and 77:
figure; the mean percentages of pup
- Page 78 and 79:
Conclusion The larger scale survey
- Page 80 and 81:
Smith, H.J., Higgins, S., Wall, K.,
- Page 82 and 83:
schools. These were combined with p
- Page 84 and 85: elevant hard and software and the r
- Page 86 and 87: Within government generally, where
- Page 88 and 89: Yet if there is little doubt in pol
- Page 90 and 91: overhead projector (OHPs) (Though,
- Page 92 and 93: intention to equip all children wit
- Page 94 and 95: technology in much the same terms (
- Page 96 and 97: In some lessons with IWBs these tec
- Page 98 and 99: use shows considerable variation in
- Page 100 and 101: Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2001) "Run
- Page 102 and 103: Annex C Analysis of the IWB Baselin
- Page 104 and 105: Table 7: Number of IWBs by Departme
- Page 106 and 107: Figure 3: Funding source by subject
- Page 108 and 109: Figure 7: Sources of funding after
- Page 110 and 111: Are perceptions of ICT consistent w
- Page 112 and 113: Table 8: Allocation of LC funding t
- Page 114 and 115: Can perceptions of ICT resources in
- Page 116 and 117: Figure 16: Number of IWBs in Maths
- Page 118 and 119: schools have done this) and 100 mea
- Page 120 and 121: Use of IWBs in Science Departments
- Page 122 and 123: department feels all six areas are
- Page 124 and 125: Use of IWBs in English Departments
- Page 126 and 127: The training needs of English depar
- Page 128 and 129: Annex D Analysis of the IWB Teacher
- Page 130 and 131: Figure 3: Type of interactive white
- Page 132 and 133: Reported Frequency of IWB Use by Te
- Page 136 and 137: How are Teachers using their IWB? A
- Page 138 and 139: Figure 14: Ease of finding suitable
- Page 140 and 141: What type of IWB training have teac
- Page 142 and 143: investment of time to integrate int
- Page 144 and 145: Many of the newer teachers do not a
- Page 146 and 147: Figure 25: Statements which the hig
- Page 148 and 149: eport IWBs are used hardly ever or
- Page 150 and 151: Table 2: Positive Statements: Perce
- Page 152 and 153: 2. 3.3 Response to technology. Tabl
- Page 154 and 155: Annex F: Survey Instruments 1. The
- Page 156 and 157: PERFORMANCE: AN EVALUATION Baseline
- Page 158 and 159: Room Subject Source of funding Date
- Page 160 and 161: INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARDS, PEDAGOGY A
- Page 162 and 163: 2. The pupil survey INTERACTIVE WHI
- Page 164: Copies of this publication can be o