FIAM USER GUIDE COVER II - Fiscal Impact Analysis Model - OKI
FIAM USER GUIDE COVER II - Fiscal Impact Analysis Model - OKI
FIAM USER GUIDE COVER II - Fiscal Impact Analysis Model - OKI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Fiscal</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>Model</strong><br />
User Guide<br />
revenue types and expenditure categories that <strong>OKI</strong> jurisdictions use are generalized in<br />
the <strong>Model</strong> into a limited number of categories. The use of these categories is intended<br />
to accommodate a wide variety of government budget information and to identify<br />
revenues and costs by type, not necessarily by each item that may be found in a local<br />
government’s budget.<br />
Revenues<br />
Revenues in the <strong>Model</strong> are limited to those taxes and fees that the local government is<br />
empowered to collect by state law, charter, enabling legislation or local ordinance.<br />
Revenues are sources of income that a jurisdiction receives through the levying of<br />
taxes, charging for various public services the municipality or township provides, levying<br />
fines and fees, and other methods of generating income that allow the local government<br />
to operate. In order to calculate potential revenues from development scenarios,<br />
existing information on revenues is needed. Both community specific revenue<br />
information and outcomes from model analysis are accommodated through the same<br />
revenue types (or categories).<br />
Based on the government structure and other factors, potential revenue types include<br />
the following:<br />
• Real Property Tax (and other taxes). Property taxes, payments in lieu of taxes<br />
and other property-based revenues as defined in local budgets are included in<br />
this revenue item. Classification of revenues as property taxes is based on local<br />
Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs), audit reports or financial<br />
reports. Specific procedures for levying real property taxes vary by state, but the<br />
process generally involves the application of a property tax rate against the<br />
property’s assessed value, which may be adjusted by state or local law to reflect<br />
ownership or land use considerations. The <strong>Model</strong> addresses adjustments by<br />
using net “effective” tax rates for each jurisdiction, which account for the value of<br />
adjustments within the rate. In Ohio, two different effective tax rates are usually<br />
applied by the County Auditor: one rate for residential or agricultural land uses,<br />
and one for commercial or industrial uses, reflecting differences in assessment<br />
adjustments between these two categories of land use. The rates used in the<br />
<strong>Model</strong> are not inclusive of any taxes levied from other taxing bodies, such as<br />
schools or special districts, but only include tax rates imposed by the specific<br />
jurisdiction. Ohio’s real property assessment ratio is 35%. Indiana and<br />
Kentucky’s ratio is 100%. These differences are also reflected in the <strong>Model</strong>.<br />
6