27.03.2015 Views

NODEM 2014 Proceedings

NODEM 2014 Proceedings

NODEM 2014 Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Exhibiting Fashion: Museums as Myth in Contemporary Branding and Media Culture<br />

However, the fact that Armani had donated a large sum to the Guggenheim also led to heated debate of institutional<br />

ethics, and the Guggenheim was accused of corporate sell-out by letting Armani buy its way into the<br />

art world (Steele 2008).<br />

Museums in fashion branding and retail design: Koolhaas & Prada<br />

Blurred boundaries<br />

Art museums serve as frameworks of reference through which commodities may be presented to consumers<br />

(Taylor 2005), articulated via the inclusion of the archetypical aesthetics of art museums in retail spaces. (Cairns<br />

2010) More prominent in museums devoted to material culture than in art museums, the most potent symbol<br />

of “the museum” in the context of fashion branding is the glass display cabinet. It tends to be appropriated in<br />

retail spaces, as a rather banal signification of “do not touch these valuable objects” or “these valuable objects<br />

are not commodities”, making objects transcend their former status as commodity. And as fashion moves into<br />

museums, the aesthetics of museums move into retail spaces, making them, as stated by Dietmar M Steiner<br />

(2000), indistinguishable from one another:<br />

Museums, by virtue of their architectonic consciousness have become places where lifestyles are staged. This potential<br />

has been extended from the field of the arts and the museum to the field of fashion and advertising. Thus, it is now<br />

becoming difficult to differentiate between a museum and a department store. (p. 21)<br />

According to Barthes, “the fundamental character of the mythical concept is to be appropriated” (p 119). Prada<br />

provides an interesting example of the many ways in which a global fashion brand may appropriate museum<br />

aesthetics and incorporate museum myths in its retail design. For more than fifteen years, Prada has collaborated<br />

extensively with OMA (Office for Contemporary Architecture) and its branch AMO (Architecture for Metropolitan<br />

Office) led by Dutch “Starchitect” Rem Koolhaas. The collaboration is extensive, and a full analysis of<br />

this is beyond the scope of this paper. However, this collaboration is key in understanding relations between<br />

fashion and museum myths in contemporary fashion branding. For Miuccia Prada and her husband and business<br />

partner Patrizio Bertelli, it was a major challenge to maintain a sense of exclusivity in times of expansion<br />

(Ryan 2005). In the book “Projects for Prada”, published by Prada’s art foundation, Fondazione Prada Milano in<br />

2001, Koolhaas presents concepts for the development of the brand. One strategy presented in the publication<br />

is to redefine shopping as a cultural activity, and redefine shoppers as museum-visitors, library-visitors etc,<br />

and to conceive of the brand’s history as an archive. Many of these concepts are present in Prada’s New York<br />

flagship store, (or Epicenter, as Prada refers to their flagship retail spaces). A spectacular space was erected on<br />

the former premises of the Soho Guggenheim, a context already infused with cultural significance, as Soho is<br />

associated with galleries and artist’s studios. Interestingly, the actual sales area in the retail space is removed<br />

from visitors’ attention, located in the lower floor, backgrounding (Cairns 2010) the commodities in favour of<br />

an experience of entering a modern art museum or a temple (Newhouse 1998).<br />

Exhibiting the fashion archive<br />

But what does the museum as myth offer Prada, a brand part-taking in the cyclical fashion system? Koolhas<br />

(unnumbered pages) states: “in a world where everything is shopping and shopping is everywhere, the ultimate<br />

luxury is not to be shopping”. This is key in understanding how museum myths are incorporated into the<br />

larger conceptualisation of shopping as culture, and articulated in the architecture and retail design of the<br />

brand. The museum is conveyed as the absence of shopping and of the active associated decision-making. In<br />

Koolhaas’s sense, the museum becomes a medium and a space where the multivalent expression of the brand<br />

may be exhibited.<br />

<strong>NODEM</strong> <strong>2014</strong> Conference & Expo<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!