19.04.2015 Views

Feb-Mar-Apr, May-June-July 1972 - Navy League of Australia

Feb-Mar-Apr, May-June-July 1972 - Navy League of Australia

Feb-Mar-Apr, May-June-July 1972 - Navy League of Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EDMUNDS BROS.<br />

Pty. Ltd.<br />

ELECTRICAL APPLIANCE EQUIPMENT WHOLESALERS<br />

464 LATROBE STREET, MELBOURNE<br />

Phone 30-4171<br />

922 NEPEAN HIGHWAY, MOORABBIN. 95-1839<br />

28c ASHLEY STREET, WEST FOOTSCRAY. 689-2309<br />

Sponsored by<br />

STANDARD TELEPHONES & CABLES<br />

PTY. LIMITED<br />

U.S. military analysts believe the Soviet Union may be<br />

A very large vessel was under construction<br />

at a shipyard at Nikolayev,<br />

on tha Black Saa. H had what<br />

appeared to be aircraft elevator wells<br />

and large tanks for aviation fuel.<br />

They estimated that the ship, when<br />

completed in about two years, would<br />

be m the 20.000-ton to 30.000-ton<br />

class.<br />

That would approach the size <strong>of</strong><br />

the U.S. Essex class aircraft carrier<br />

and would be the largest warship in<br />

the Soviet fleet.<br />

Since construction was still in a<br />

relatively early stage, the analysts<br />

said they could not be sure what kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> ship it would be.<br />

Some said the only other kind <strong>of</strong><br />

ship it might be was a petroleum<br />

supertanker.<br />

But several factors lead most<br />

analysts towards the view it will be<br />

an aircraft carrier.<br />

These include:<br />

The ship is not being built at one <strong>of</strong><br />

the commercial yards, but at<br />

Nikolayev. where the helicopter<br />

carriers Moskva and Leningrad were<br />

built.<br />

Large elevator wells would not<br />

seem appropriate for a supertanker.<br />

They are wider than those on<br />

the Moskva and Leningrad, suggesting<br />

they are designed for<br />

lowering planes rather than helicopters.<br />

Early construction appears to be<br />

that <strong>of</strong> a warship with several decks,<br />

rather than a tanker, which would<br />

have very deep storage areas and<br />

only a top deck.<br />

building its first aircraft-carrier.<br />

Finally, the analysts believe that, if<br />

the Russians are determined to<br />

operate fleets <strong>of</strong> warships in places<br />

such as the Pacific and Indian<br />

Oceans, the Mediterranean and the<br />

Caribbean, they would need aircraft<br />

carriers to help protect the surface<br />

ships from air attack and to project<br />

tactical air power ashore.<br />

The vulnerability <strong>of</strong> U.S. carriers to<br />

attack has long been asserted in<br />

Soviet military literature.<br />

Indeed, the Russians have<br />

developed a variety <strong>of</strong> relatively longrange<br />

missiles that can be fired<br />

against carriers from bombers,<br />

surface ships and submarines.<br />

What is not well known, though, is<br />

that in the late 1930s — as part <strong>of</strong> an<br />

effort to design and build a large<br />

ocean-going navy as opposed to one<br />

for territorial defence — Stalin<br />

unsuccessfully attempted to get<br />

U.S. help, in the form <strong>of</strong> blueprints<br />

and some components, to build<br />

carriers.<br />

Four carriers were said to have<br />

been planned for completion by<br />

1948<br />

Robert Herrick said in his book<br />

"Soviet Naval Strategy". published<br />

by the U.S. Naval Institute in 1968.<br />

that World War II caused the money<br />

destined for carriers to be diverted to<br />

other military programmes<br />

American analysts said they had<br />

seen no evidence the Russians were<br />

developing and testing jets with<br />

folding wings to allow them to fit in<br />

the ship's elevators or with low-stall<br />

speeds to enable them to slow<br />

sufficiently to land on a carrier's<br />

short flight deck.<br />

• But this did not mean such<br />

development efforts were not under<br />

way: they said.<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> them felt that, if the<br />

Russians did intend to add one or<br />

more carriers to their <strong>Navy</strong>, they<br />

probably would employ — initially,<br />

at least — so-called vertical and<br />

short take-<strong>of</strong>f and landing aircraft.<br />

Sincc 1967 the Russians have been<br />

known to be experimenting with<br />

such jets.<br />

A Yakovlev jet. code-named<br />

Freehand by Western analysts, was<br />

flown at an air show at Domodedovo<br />

in <strong>July</strong>. 1967<br />

314 ST. GEORGES ROAD<br />

THORNBURY, VIC.<br />

Telephone: 480 1255<br />

Best Wishes to all Naval and Kx-Naval Personnel from<br />

T. EARLY & SONS<br />

PTY. LTD.<br />

Manufacturers <strong>of</strong><br />

QUALITY FURNITURb<br />

300 LYTTON ROAD<br />

COLMSLIE, QLD. 4170<br />

Telephone: 95-2788<br />

HERBERT HOTEL<br />

(N.R.tR. FARRAWAY, Lie.)<br />

STOKES STREET. TOWNSVILLE, QLD.<br />

Cool Ale always on Tap. Friendly service assured.<br />

Excellent accommodation Full range ol Wines<br />

and Spirits Stocked in our Bottle Dept<br />

Telephone 71-2641<br />

Paft Thirty-Four<br />

THE NAVY<br />

<strong>Feb</strong>ruary/<strong>Mar</strong>ctV<strong>Apr</strong>ll, <strong>1972</strong><br />

Fabruary/<strong>Mar</strong>ch/<strong>Apr</strong>ll, <strong>1972</strong> THE NAVY P«C« Thirty-five

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!