19.04.2015 Views

Feb-Mar-Apr, May-June-July 1972 - Navy League of Australia

Feb-Mar-Apr, May-June-July 1972 - Navy League of Australia

Feb-Mar-Apr, May-June-July 1972 - Navy League of Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tha i n m to efficiency Ilea in QUALITY CONTROL<br />

DISTRIBUTED BY<br />

LOVELOCKS<br />

suppliers to Royal <strong>Australia</strong>n <strong>Navy</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> QUALITY CONTROL equipment for<br />

Refrigeration, Airconditioning and<br />

Industrial applications, Du Pont<br />

FREON refrigerants and solvents<br />

F. C. LOVELOCK PTY. LIMITED<br />

Head Office and Sydnay Branch:<br />

19-21 BUCKLAND STREET, BROADWAY — Phona: 211-2811<br />

NEWCASTLE CANBERRA PERTH<br />

766 HUNTER ST JWILUNAST I.G. PRITCHARDP/L<br />

NEWCASTLE WEST FYSHWICK HK HAVELOCK ST.<br />

Phone:61-57115 Phone: 95-K22 Phone: 21-6546<br />

ADELAIDE BRISBANE MELBOURNE<br />

162-164 GOUGER ST. 67-73 MARY ST 602 LITTLECOLLINSST.<br />

Phone:51-2154 Phone: 2-3481 Phone 61-2545<br />

MERCATOR SALES<br />

COMPANY<br />

A Division <strong>of</strong><br />

The Schlegel Manufacturing Co. (Aust.) Pty. Ltd.<br />

565-569 HARRIS STREET, ULTIMO, N.S.W.<br />

Phona 211-2855<br />

Suppliers to the Department <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Navy</strong> <strong>of</strong>:—<br />

NEW! GOLD FORMULA AQUAMATIC UNIVERSAL<br />

The most advanced Synthetic cutting fluid known.<br />

A report received from the Dept. <strong>Navy</strong> shows outstanding results in all<br />

machining applications.<br />

Aquamatic has solved the problem <strong>of</strong> Dermaiitis on the hands <strong>of</strong> Operators.<br />

Pace Fifty THE NAVY <strong>Feb</strong>ruary/<strong>Mar</strong>ch/<strong>Apr</strong>il,<br />

AUSTRALIA S<br />

DEF tNCE OUTLOOk<br />

The propaganda <strong>of</strong> the East and<br />

the leftist idealism <strong>of</strong> the West have<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten made common cause in recent<br />

times by proposing pacifism as a<br />

policy for the West while choosing to<br />

disregard the monumental<br />

militarism <strong>of</strong> the East. For all the talk<br />

<strong>of</strong> peace there has never been a time<br />

when the world has faced such a<br />

frightening and massive agglomeration<br />

<strong>of</strong> armed might as is accruing in<br />

the Soviet Union today. So much for<br />

the common man's dreams <strong>of</strong><br />

peace. The Communists <strong>of</strong>fer us the<br />

peace <strong>of</strong> a prison.<br />

The same contrast applies in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> the armed forces themselves. In<br />

the Communist countries there is no<br />

apology for the basic recruiting<br />

"incentive' which is that <strong>of</strong> a<br />

requirement by the State — again<br />

with the ultimate sanction <strong>of</strong><br />

forceable induction into the services.<br />

In <strong>Australia</strong> however, we have tried<br />

primarily the method <strong>of</strong> increasing<br />

incentives <strong>of</strong> a different kind. Wages<br />

and conditions for our servicemen<br />

have been bettered immeasureably.<br />

and compare very favourably with<br />

community norms. Our National<br />

Service reauirement is the minimum<br />

which has been necessary to sustain<br />

what is after all a very small fighting<br />

force in face <strong>of</strong> the counterattractions<br />

<strong>of</strong> civilian life.<br />

WHERE AUSTRALIA STANDS:<br />

Turning now to Austral.a's unique<br />

position, let me reiterate that the<br />

major questions facing us in<br />

defending <strong>Australia</strong> are primarily<br />

political. Looking at the world scene<br />

it is obvious that the super-power<br />

with whom we stand most closely<br />

and with whom we hold most in<br />

common is the U.S.A. In the same<br />

way. among the second line powers.<br />

Europe (including the U.K.) is clearly<br />

our closest associate, and we have<br />

high hopes that Japan and India will<br />

continue along the democratic path.<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> our diplomatic initiative <strong>of</strong><br />

the future should be directed<br />

towards greater and closer ties with<br />

these two countries, and <strong>of</strong> course<br />

with our next-door neighbour.<br />

Indonesia.<br />

We can and should project our<br />

politico-diplomatic defence<br />

strategies into the region most vital<br />

to our own interests. The future <strong>of</strong><br />

Singapore and Malaysia are<br />

obviously important, and the ANZUK<br />

arrangements are a demonstration<br />

<strong>of</strong> our concern and desire for a voice<br />

in any new power movements in the<br />

area.<br />

Overarching all else however is the<br />

great politico-defence value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ANZUS Treaty which both we and<br />

more importantly the U.S.A.<br />

consider vital to defence planning.<br />

This represents solid achievement in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> ultimate defence. No realist<br />

would argue that an automatic<br />

response should be demanded<br />

whereby we would obtain instant<br />

support from the U.S.A. without<br />

prior decision by their political<br />

authority. Nevertheless, every new<br />

assertion <strong>of</strong> the prime importance <strong>of</strong><br />

ANZUS. such as achieved by Mr<br />

McMahon when in Washington<br />

recently, is <strong>of</strong> immense value, and is<br />

about as far as any realist could<br />

expect our ally to go.<br />

Nevertheless, having said all this, it<br />

is still necessary for us to ask<br />

ourselves in brutal frankness such<br />

questions as: How sure are we <strong>of</strong><br />

the possibilities <strong>of</strong> our closest<br />

friends maintaining their present<br />

political determination?' — or 'To<br />

what degree will the future<br />

governments <strong>of</strong> allied nations be<br />

able to count on the support <strong>of</strong> their<br />

own peoples in situations which<br />

could be vital to our security but<br />

which might involve them in the<br />

sacrifices <strong>of</strong> war?' These questions<br />

are the political crunch for all treatymakers.<br />

In addition to political considerations<br />

there are. <strong>of</strong> course, economic<br />

and industrial areas where once<br />

again it is necessary for us to<br />

question whetner the West as a<br />

whole can match the resources <strong>of</strong><br />

the East. Our friends and ourselves<br />

are vulnerable to tactics <strong>of</strong> division,<br />

industrial sabotage and the<br />

destruction <strong>of</strong> confidence which can<br />

readily reduce our economic<br />

strength. In terms <strong>of</strong> military<br />

manpower and hardware the<br />

ultimate question emerges whether<br />

the West will be able to retain at least<br />

an equally or sufficiently formidable<br />

capacity to deter aggression.<br />

It is vitally necessary for us in<br />

<strong>Australia</strong> to learn the politicomilitary<br />

lessons <strong>of</strong> Indo-China and<br />

Taiwan as well as those <strong>of</strong> Central<br />

Europe. We have seen the sentiment,<br />

loyalty or morality factors in international<br />

politics sink to bottom place<br />

among necessary considerations.<br />

Indo-China and Taiwan are cases in<br />

point. The world generally is apparently<br />

prepared to sacrifice the freedom<br />

<strong>of</strong> these countries, and with it<br />

the lives <strong>of</strong> millions who have trusted<br />

their word for motives varying from<br />

sheer indifference to a transient political<br />

expediency In the light <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cold realities <strong>of</strong> super-power politics,<br />

a small power such as ourselves must<br />

surely be excused for cynicism in<br />

this field. It should be admitted that<br />

protests against any form <strong>of</strong> military<br />

action are much more effective in<br />

the West than in the East, to say the<br />

least. By the same token too. the<br />

resources <strong>of</strong> the West — whether<br />

political, economic, military, or in<br />

the mass media — these areas are<br />

much more open to attack from<br />

within than they are in the<br />

Communist world.<br />

<strong>Australia</strong>'* 4.900-ton guldad missile destroyer <strong>of</strong> tha Charles F Adams class. H.M.A.S. Perth

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!