16.11.2012 Views

eurochem-annual-report-2011

eurochem-annual-report-2011

eurochem-annual-report-2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Business review<br />

Management <strong>report</strong><br />

Income statement continued<br />

Structure of materials and components <strong>2011</strong><br />

RUBm<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7 1<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

3<br />

54 EuroChem Annual Report and Accounts <strong>2011</strong><br />

2<br />

<strong>2011</strong> 2010 2009<br />

1 Natural gas 13,619 12,006 9,250<br />

2 Apatite 7,566 5,442 1,039<br />

3 Other 6,871 5,111 4,741<br />

4 Goods for resale 5,296 2,991 2,671<br />

5 Sulphur 2,964 1,499 1,448<br />

6 Ammonia 2,990 264 340<br />

7 Potassium<br />

chloride 1,295 1038 955<br />

Total 40,601 28,351 20,444<br />

Despite the gradual increase of natural gas prices in Russia, we continue to benefit from cost advantages<br />

over competitors operating in areas with higher gas prices, such as, for example, Ukraine and Europe.<br />

The Russian government’s current intention to gradually raise domestic gas prices to a level equivalent<br />

to the European netback price has prompted us to initiate a partial back integration into gas production<br />

so as to provide us with a natural hedge. Nevertheless, despite the planned increase, as illustrated in the<br />

tables below, a significant cost advantage is expected to remain even when assuming domestic gas prices<br />

reach European netback levels<br />

Maintaining competitiveness in nitrogen<br />

Prilled urea, delivered to Brazil cost (USD/tonne)<br />

Nevinnomysskiy Azot<br />

Ukrainian producers<br />

East-European producers<br />

0<br />

Assuming gas price = USD 160/1,000m3 (equivalent to USD 340 netback price from Europe)<br />

Assuming gas price = USD 235/1,000m3 Assuming gas price = USD 374/1,000m<br />

Gas cost Other production costs Delivery costs<br />

3<br />

50 100 150 200 250 300 350<br />

Prilled urea, delivered to Europe cost (USD/tonne)<br />

Novomoskovskiy Azot<br />

European producers<br />

Ukrainian producers<br />

0<br />

* Gas costs for Western Europe as at German border.<br />

Assuming gas price = USD 160/1,000m3 (equivalent to USD 340 netback price from Europe)<br />

Assuming gas price = USD 364/1,000m3 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />

Assuming gas price = USD 235/1,000m<br />

350<br />

Gas cost Other production costs Delivery costs Import duty (Europe)<br />

3<br />

Distribution, general and administrative and other operating expenses<br />

Compared to 2010, total distribution costs increased by RUB 1.2bn or 7% to reach RUB 19.0bn as<br />

compared to RUB 17.8bn in 2010. Transportation costs remained the main component of distribution costs<br />

and accounted for 84% of these expenses in <strong>2011</strong> compared to 87% the previous year. Despite the year’s<br />

lower iron ore sales volumes and the oversupply situation on the freight market, slightly higher fertilizer<br />

sales volumes for some products coupled with longer average shipping distances nudged transportation<br />

costs up 3% to RUB 15.8bn.<br />

General and administrative (G&A) expenses were 24% higher in <strong>2011</strong> at RUB 4.7bn, as compared to the<br />

RUB 3.8bn of the previous year. G&A labour costs, which went from representing 56% to 52% of G&A<br />

expenses, rose 16% year-on-year to RUB 2.4bn. The increase was spurred by a combination of salary<br />

indexation and increased personnel intake for the development of our potash deposits. Other expenses<br />

grew 42%, in part due to increases in property tax expenses which stemmed from additions to fixed assets.<br />

Other operating expenses were higher in <strong>2011</strong> and amounted to RUB 191m, as compared to RUB 17m<br />

in 2010. Behind these expenses were operating (i.e. those not resulting from financial activities) foreign<br />

exchange losses of RUB 200m from the depreciation of the US dollar against the Russian rouble in <strong>2011</strong><br />

versus gains of RUB 208m the previous year on strong US dollar appreciation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!