SAWE Report - Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
SAWE Report - Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
SAWE Report - Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4 Stealth Considerations<br />
As mentioned by the RFP, the aircraft is required to meet a stealth requirement. This is a very<br />
important driver for the aircraft. The entire design is influenced by this consideration equally as<br />
much as aerodynamics. There are many low observable considerations to be taken into account.<br />
The first and most obvious is the radar cross section (RCS).<br />
From the aspect of RCS, there are many drivers for an aircraft. The majority of the radar return<br />
comes from the shaping of the aircraft. The fuselage is constructed from flat sides and constant<br />
radius curves. The sides are kept at a 60° angle from the horizontal and the bottom is kept flat<br />
(Figure 4.1). This is desired because, as later shown, the footprint of the aircraft remains small.<br />
Another feature is the canted tails. This keeps the surfaces in the empennage section from<br />
creating 90 degree angles. This is important because the 90 degree angle would radiate RF<br />
energy directly back in the direction of the source. The leading edge sweep is 40°. This creates<br />
spikes well off of the frontal aspect of the aircraft. All other leading edges are kept swept at this<br />
same angle in order to minimize the magnitude of the frontal spoke. The 15° look up angle was<br />
considered the most important aspect of the RCS. The majority of the threat encountered will be<br />
below the Vendetta. This implies that they will be looking up at the aircraft, not from the front.<br />
This is where the majority of the stealth considerations were taken into account. (See Figure 4.1)<br />
The Low observability requirements are not only for RCS. In fact, the RFP specifically specifies<br />
“Balanced Observables”. Aside form RCS, IR accounts for the next highest threat. Emissivity<br />
matching can reduce the IR signature of the aircraft. The Vendetta will be coated with a material<br />
with similar emissivity as the surroundings, aiding in the disappearance of the aircraft to an IR<br />
sensor. The actual odds of becoming invisible to the IR sensor are fairly unrealistic due to the<br />
cold surroundings. The aircraft is shadowed by what is essentially space at 50,000 feet. It is<br />
hard to hide a warm object when backlit by a cold space. The other stealth consideration in this<br />
area is the nozzles. These are axisymmetric nozzles that are proven to have lower IR signatures<br />
than the axis symmetric option. This, combined with the frontal look-up threat direction<br />
minimizes the impact on IR stealth.<br />
40° LE Sweep<br />
All other Surfaces<br />
Matched<br />
Hidden Canted<br />
Verticals<br />
60° Facet<br />
Figure 4.1 - Stealth Considerations<br />
16