22.06.2015 Views

SAWE Report - Cal Poly San Luis Obispo

SAWE Report - Cal Poly San Luis Obispo

SAWE Report - Cal Poly San Luis Obispo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

difference in neutral point and center of gravity greater. This difference means the aircraft is<br />

actually more stable in a supersonic cruise. The fact that the center of gravity is so far forward in<br />

relation to the neutral point causes the aircraft to pitch down. More trim is required which causes<br />

drag. This phenomenon is known as Mach tuck.<br />

It is because of this that the weight and balance of the aircraft must be closely in synch with the<br />

control system. Trim drag will be minimized and controllability will be enhanced with<br />

completely integrated systems.<br />

Canting the horizontals in a v-tail configuration was investigated in an attempt to shape the<br />

empennage in a stealthy manner. The effective area of the vertical and horizontal are functions of<br />

the square of the cosine of the cant angle. These effects are reflected in Figure 10.2.<br />

Figure 10.2 - Horizontal Area Required for Static Stability with Cant Angle<br />

It can be seen from the plot that as the cant angle increases the total planform area of the<br />

horizontal must increase to maintain the nominally desired static stability of 5%. Five percent<br />

was chosen because at this stage in the sizing it was uncertain what the dynamic characteristics<br />

of the aircraft would be. Attempting to maintain a minimally statically stable aircraft would ease<br />

the job of control system design if future needs warrant one. Angles up to 30° were looked at<br />

because it would be unwise from an RCS point of view to approach a 90° angle created by larger<br />

cants near 45°. Beyond 45° the trend would be the same; however the horizontal would drive the<br />

area instead of the vertical.<br />

This plot shows that only 118 ft 2 of horizontal area is required to maintain the desired static<br />

margin. This is far off from the historical class I method and by initial inspection appears small.<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!