SAWE Report - Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
SAWE Report - Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
SAWE Report - Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Diameter (in)<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
Length (in)<br />
0<br />
0<br />
12,000 17,000 22,000 27,000 32,000<br />
Thrust (lbF)<br />
Figure 6.4 - Engine Sizing Plot<br />
6.2 Inlets<br />
Sizing the inlet for supercruise flight at 1.6 Mach posed an interesting problem. A pitot inlet is<br />
good up until about 1.6 Mach and it is by far the cheapest inlet possible. However the<br />
performance of the inlet above Mach 1.6 is very poor. The pressure recovery of a two shock inlet<br />
(one oblique and one normal shock) and a three shock inlet were analyzed. The optimum<br />
deflection angle for Mach 1.6 flow was found for a two shock inlet by finding the stagnation<br />
pressure loss across the oblique and normal shock for different deflection angles. The results<br />
were graphed in Figure 6.5 and the resulting deflection angle for the greatest pressure recovery<br />
was found to be 10.75 degrees yielding a pressure recovery of 97.65%. Finding the optimum<br />
deflection angle for a three shock inlet is more involved therefore a rough estimate of a six<br />
degree deflection angle followed by another 6 degree deflection angle was used to compare<br />
against the two shock inlet. The difference in on design pressure recovery is about 1% however<br />
the larger the deflection angles become the better the pressure recovery will become. The<br />
pressure recovery comparison can be seen in Figure 6.6. The military specification for inlets is<br />
given below and is represented in the graph.<br />
Mil Spec MIL-E-5008B<br />
η<br />
rSpec<br />
⎧ 1 M ≤ 1<br />
⎩1<br />
0.075( 1) 1 5<br />
0<br />
= ⎨ −<br />
1.35<br />
M0 − < M0<br />
<<br />
41